Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-26-2010, 06:58 AM
garnoil garnoil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: Current System Limitations

Quote:
Originally Posted by suicune View Post
It's currently limited by the TDM hardware - that's the entire point. They've enforced the limitations on the native systems purely so that they don't suffer a TDM users revolt (although they kinda had that anyway with PT9 - you've gotta feel a little sorry for them).

Until we see new TDM hardware cards with massively increased voice counts we're stuck with it.

You say that Native has an artificial voice limitation that Avid implemented so that Native is always "smaller-less capable" than TDM? I think this is the wrong "marketing approach" for Avid. The way things are going, In a couple of years other DAWs will run hundreds (may be even a thousand) voices and PT will still be either artificially limited in the Native version or limited by the new TDM hardware when it comes out.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-27-2010, 07:20 AM
Sean Russell Sean Russell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 1,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by digidesigner View Post
I do care about nulling, if something perfectly nulls no matter if it was 44.1 or 88.2 khz form start then I see no reason to use more resources than needed. Will try this myself then thankyou.
But... Anything with any type of chorus/flange/time-based will not null.

And starting at 44k yields you no extra headroom for processing.
__________________
... but does it help the chorus?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-27-2010, 07:24 AM
Sean Russell Sean Russell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 1,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garnoil View Post
You say that Native has an artificial voice limitation that Avid implemented so that Native is always "smaller-less capable" than TDM? I think this is the wrong "marketing approach" for Avid. The way things are going, In a couple of years other DAWs will run hundreds (may be even a thousand) voices and PT will still be either artificially limited in the Native version or limited by the new TDM hardware when it comes out.
You can't give Native unlimited voicing and keep TDM'ers on a 192/96 voice system. We'd freak out a lot louder then we did. Sessions would be showing up with us having no way to play all tracks back. it happened when Pt7 came out and I was still using MIX rigs, and it was embarrassing - 80 tracks on the hook and the G4 could only playback 64 TOTAL!!

Better marketing would have been to release new cards with 192 voices at 96k (384 voices at 44k) and then let Native go Native, voice-count-wise.
__________________
... but does it help the chorus?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I upgrade my current Pro Tools system; please advise terhardp 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 29 02-27-2013 08:15 AM
Mix system i/o limitations Tal Digidesign Hardware & Software 5 07-04-2009 08:16 AM
PT 24 on current WIN XP system dk01 Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) 1 04-01-2003 08:33 PM
A. Hallada's system...current component's? guy.fi 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 07-20-2002 01:56 PM
Can I upgrade my current 9600 PT system from 5.0 to 5.1? Boom Chic Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 25 04-18-2002 09:35 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com