|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Summing device
Anyone any tips for using a summing amp.I have a HD2 Accel with an 96i i/o and a 96i/
Mixing ITB but want to use a summing amp like a Dangerous or upgrade my 8 channel Millenia to a 8ch summing amp to use it with the 96i/o. Do i need to bounce the whole mix to a stereo file or do i need to put all the channeloutputs to a bus> the output of this bus to a summing amp > outputs of the summing amp to the inputs of the 96i/o and record the stereo input to an seperate stereo audio track in the session?? Anyone any suggestions??
__________________
Jimmy Makhaisingh Producer Mix/Mastering Engineer JimJam Studio iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2015) PT11HD HDX /HD i/o Magma Thunderbolt 2.0 Chasis 3T Manley Vari-Mu / MPassive Mastering version Sonnox bundle / McDsp / FabFilter / |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
The idea of the summing amp is to allow the mix bus to be summed in Analogue as opposed to digital so what you need to do is ideally use 4 or more stereo busses. Allocate different tracks to the different stereo busses (which are physical stereo outputs) and then the summing amp summs the stereo busses into a stereo mix. You can then record that mix back into your DAW. I had previously been using 8 stereo busses out of my Digi002 (Analog pairs 1+2, 3+4, 5+6 and 7+8 and ADAT output pairs 1+2, 3+4, 5+6 and 7+8) into an Audient Summing buss.
Hope this helps |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Summing device
esynce pretty musch described it. a summing device, like th DANGEROUS, takes 8 pairs of ins (16 channels) and sums it to 2. so, you could bus your drums to out 1-2, bas to 3, vocal to 4, guitars to 5-6, keys to 7-8, etc....
then, i re-print that SUM back into Pro Tools.
__________________
Tom Hambleton CAS Ministry of Fancy Noises IMDb Undertone on Facebook Undertone Custom Sound Libraries "Groupable markers would be epochal!" -Starcrash |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
esynce (or anyone else using a summing buss) -
Do you feel like you can hear a clear difference between ITB and analog summing? Have you done any A-B tests to compare? I'm interested in more feedback on this topic - I've heard things from both sides and I'm still unsure if the difference is very clear. Also, does anyone know what kind of electronics are in a typical passive summing box (no gain, just in/out and sum)... Seems like there can't be much going on there, but companies still charge quite a bit for the boxes. I've seriously considered trying to build one DIY. Thanks in Advance, Jt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
Quote:
My personal bottom line on the issue is this. Why not just buy an analog console? Maybe a used mixing board with some character would be worth looking at. I think so. Names like Soundcraft, Trident...TL Audio, Speck...there might even be something reasonable out there in a Neve or API direction. How about Midas? They have a new, lower priced model out. For what some of these summing buses cost, we might be better off with a vintage mixer. Until I find a gem for the right price, I think I'll probably buy a Folcrom summing bus (usually see it for around $775, passive, nothing but good news) and tie it back into certain preamps. That may actually be the ultimate solution for me and some other users, depending on the preamps available. If you have some Neves, APIs, Manleys, Telefunken, Siemens or well-made "clones" thereof, or Grace, Millennia or any other fine preamps that please you, then according to the passive summing box advocates, you're set. The pre will be "the sound." Sounds like you already know this, but I just wanted to explain my thinking, or at least where I'm leaning as of today. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
I've always loved the sound of my API 325 summing amps and I sort of miss it since mixing ITB so I've been thinking ... what if I take 2 of them and set them up as unity gain summing amps with just 1 input each and patch them into the master out. Has anyone tried this? Is it worth it?
One of these days I'll get some time and set them up and give it a try. Maybe they will add just enough of that API sound.
__________________
Mac Pro: 3,1, 8 core, 6GB RAM. OS 10.6.8, Protools 10.3.8 TDM HD2 Accel. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
You can test analog summing in a basic way by creating groups or 'stems' as they say, and sending it out through a dual preamp and record to new tracks. Break up your mix into 2 groups or 'stems' and record them in 2 passes to 2 pairs of stereo tracks and bounce that to disk. Compare it with your latest BTD mix and see which you prefer.
To build a very simple passive summing box you need a pile of resistors, connecters and of course, a box. Check out www.groupdiy.com and search through it and you will find schematics for doing this. You could build a basic folcrom style box for cheap to test passive summing for yourself. IMHO an analog desk is a great idea but is not cost effective if you only need it for summing. And while you're at www.groupdiy.com you might just decide to build your own LA2A, or 1176, or SSL bus compressor, or NEVE mic pre, or API eq or....... byron |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
Quote:
Now i don't own any "summming amps," but the good man I bought the gear from suggested I use any or all of the following: compressors, EQs, and preamps. They don't even have to be "on" as far as compressor or EQ settings go, if you know what I mean. Just some appropriate gain. It may be good enough, in other words, if the final product simply picks up the textural nuances of the analog pipeline. punk- Thanks for posting a wealth of info. Looks very Useful. Thanks. Mike Colucci |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
Quote:
FWIW I mix ITB sometimes and OTB others, and use a Dangerous 2-Bus (pristinely preserves what you've already got) and a Chandler Mini Rack Mixer (adds Neve-ish mojo) every day that I mix OTB. Despite the conflicting reports, there is an obvious difference between ITB and OTB, and just as huge a difference among the OTB product choices. For example, my initial experiment was to pull all the stops on an ITB mix. The artist and I totally dug it and printed it. Then we went to a room with an SSL 9000J, and went direct out of PT into the 9K at unity gain, introducing the SSL pan pots into the equation, and using PT automation. There was a difference between the ITB and SSL results, and we ultimately chose to master the SSL version, but the difference was subtle. On the other hand, when I use the Dangerous and/or the Chandler, the difference is not subtle--it's huge. Go figure… a $1 Million desk vs. a $3000 or $8000 summing box, and the more affordable route makes the bigger difference. Great results, more clarity, and zero tech time… Maybe you are--or maybe you're not--better off with an analog console. For me, the choice was obvious. Quote:
__________________
Michael James michaeljamesproducer.com www.IndieProMix.com System info: PT Ultimate 2019.6 HDX, Mac Pro 5,1 Westmere, OS 10.13.3, UAD2 Octo PCIe, 2x Lynx Aurora16 w LTHD cards, 1x Lynx Aurora(n) 32 ch analog I/O DigiLink, 4x Dangerous Convert-8 (AES via Lynx), Dangerous Convert-2 (AES via Lynx), Dangerous Vonvert AD+, Apogee Big Ben, SSD boot drive, external FW800 audio drives |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Summing device
Michael James makes a number of good points. You really have to compare different approaches and decide for yourself. The combinations and possibilities are endless. Do some tests, even simple ones with the outboard gear you currently have, to get some idea for yourself of the differences. Contrary to all the endless debates on this topic, there isn't a 'better' way just 'different' ways. There is nothing 'wrong' with total ITB or BTD mixes. But if you try some different approaches where you sum externally I would be very surprised if you don't prefer some method of external or analog summing.
My opinion of the different methods doesn't matter. You can make a summing device with patch cables and resistors if you can read a schematic. Choose what works and is affordable to your needs. I love mixing inside PT. Instant recall is such a powerful tool IMHO. With external summing, PT is just an incredible, affordable system. YMMV byron |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASIO device properties have been changed by the device control panel. | medinarawk | Third Party Interfaces | 5 | 07-06-2015 02:18 PM |
So does adding a Firewire 400 device to Mac device with... | JoyMODE101 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 09-28-2009 12:12 AM |
Cannot use disk device as "playback" device Pro-tools 7.4Mac | Matt Darcy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 06-20-2008 07:46 AM |
pro tools summing or digital board summing | kingz | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 9 | 04-29-2004 12:46 AM |
D8B Summing vs. Pro Tools Summing | Sound Guy Andy | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 03-08-2002 04:04 AM |