|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
i wanted to run an external cd burner, out of the digi outs, while i bounce to disk, so i have it on file twice:
once going to BTD, and another shot to the cd burner. whats best to shoot it out from? my cd burner has an input option of coxial, optical , and ofcourse analog.... so what should i pick? im also assuming that the cd burner will automatically make the conversion from the 24bit -(L1 dithered to 16bit) PT session to the cdr in the cd burner. this should result to a good sounding product, right? then if i wanted to get the cdr redcoded i just load up the freshly burned cdr up into JAM and do it from there.....is this better than just doing a regular bounce to disk? [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
Quote:
__________________
froyo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
Best to go digital since you're there already...I've heard on several occasions that coax will sound better than optical, but I'm not sure how much truth there is to that statement.
As for your "conversion" question, the burner's not likely to convert unless it has dithering built in...otherwise it'll just truncate, but if you've already dithered to 16 bits in PT it's only truncating a bunch of zeroes. N problem there. Same doesn't hold true for sampling rate...unless it has a sample rate converter built in, it won't work with anything but a 44.1kHz rate. -Duardo |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
I have the HHB 830. I have called them and the unit creates ONLY 44.1/16. I got a Monster Coax cable, and have determined that the digital to digital (coaxial) is the Very Finest sound.
The HHB auto truncates any signal you send it. I do Not think that BTD is even close in quality. I set my L2 to 24bit Ultra, and let the burner truncate down to 16...I tried 16 on the L2, but decided in Multiple tests that the 24 bit dither sounded better in my case... I also BTD and recorded to my burner, and determined that the Best sound was to just play the song, and that when I did Both BTD and Record to HHB that the sound was Not the same/best quality... The analog has a D/A--A/D process that is Not as good as coax... With Optical, I started getting Pops, and I find S/PDIF--Coax much more reliable... [img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
I Seek the Holy Light... Isaiah 40:31 72 Strat with single 2-Blade pickup PTLE 10.3 LE 2-SSL Alpha Channels - 1 SSL G-Compressor Apogee Rosetta 200 - Z-Systems Opti-patch Lexicon MPX-G2 Guitar Processor - .003r Command 8 - Roland JV1000 + Triton Rack FOCAL TWIN 3way speakers + JBL Q108MK11 Bottom 2-52 jax MilSpeck Patch Bays 2-22" Apple Cinema Display's Allen & Heath 16ch Mixr **Currently = 11-1-12 2 CD's Released-1-2003-2-2012 Worship ROCK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
hey guitates,
that sounds like a good move doing the 24 bit dither and just letting the burner truncate the dithered zeros, at 16 bits. if it even works like that....it sounds like it should be way efficient in perserving the sound. so i read that the s/pdif outs arent balanced. how do i balance them, and at what level? after the cd is burned on the burner (im using a $350 consumer aiwa) do i just load it back up to the g4 and use toast to extract to a folder and then from the folder load up into Jam for redbook code (or can i import straight from the loaded cdr into Jam?) [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
The HHB suggests that you keep the S/PDIF cable under 6'...Yes it is unbalanced and a longer cable is not as good...
I make my CD...Then, I make a dual mono bounce--NO conversion for MLCD or Jam...I found that the signal going to the burner is Not the same if I bounce at the same time... I will try Toast Audio Extractor, but I have Not yet...
__________________
I Seek the Holy Light... Isaiah 40:31 72 Strat with single 2-Blade pickup PTLE 10.3 LE 2-SSL Alpha Channels - 1 SSL G-Compressor Apogee Rosetta 200 - Z-Systems Opti-patch Lexicon MPX-G2 Guitar Processor - .003r Command 8 - Roland JV1000 + Triton Rack FOCAL TWIN 3way speakers + JBL Q108MK11 Bottom 2-52 jax MilSpeck Patch Bays 2-22" Apple Cinema Display's Allen & Heath 16ch Mixr **Currently = 11-1-12 2 CD's Released-1-2003-2-2012 Worship ROCK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
By peterparker
Quote:
__________________
froyo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
Hey,
I ve been on this one for while as well - I have found that going out coax to a cdr with a dither plug on the master fader such as the digi pow or even the L1 has been the best sound for me. I just play the track & record on the cdr at the same time with the dither plug on the master & this is much better sounding than btd imho. After - I just extract the song into toast to make multiple copies for distribution. With the toast I get the exact same sound as it does no conversion - just an extraction of 0s 1s of audio. By the way most of the time I use the digi dither plug which tested better to me than all the others but I sure would like to know of any others outhere? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
yeah, what i was saying about the redbook code thing...is all i know that in order to have a cd professionally manufactured (glass mastering like at discmakers or some big company like that) there needs to be a certain code in the master cdr you send them. all i know that a program like itunes doesnt produce this needed code for glass mastering, BUT JAM does. i thought i heard this code referred to as red code, but i may be wrong. but i am positive that something like that exsists.
* so pretty much my question was; after i burn my cdr from the external burner.......i would then load it into the g4........and i was curious if there was any loss in quality if i extracted with Toast to a folder, (wait im not finished) ---AND THEN load the extracted audio files from the folder up into JAM so i can then burn a cdr with that code needed for glass mastering. because i dought that the external cd burner would apply this code, so i would need to get it on there with JAM. i was just wondering if i would be loosing any quality doing it the way i just described.......so i know wether this way is well worth it.......or if i should just go back to doing a BTD, and then just load it into JAM from there. [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shooting out of 001 to burner -what\'s the best quality: coxial, optical, or analog?
p.s. oh yeah, and also would i want to balance my s/pdif outs leading to the external burner, since they are not balanced.
if needed, how do i balance them? and what do i balance them to? thanks again. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT: CD burner quality | msunj | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 12-16-2003 07:09 AM |
Hi quality DVD/CDR burner opinions? | duskb | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 10-30-2003 09:25 AM |
bad quality of CD burner | JC925602 | General Discussion | 2 | 02-02-2003 11:47 AM |
Using adat optical to get another quality A/D? | VK$$$ | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 12-03-2002 05:12 PM |
Which CD burner has best audio quality | Racer-x | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 8 | 02-23-2002 02:35 AM |