![]() |
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I usually bounce down my final mix analog and into a 2-track in protools...
I apply compression and a Limiter to give it a mastering.. My question is what is the differnce when applying those mastering pluggins either on that 2 track mixdown track then send the signal to the master fader and do a bounce, compared to putting the pluggins after(not on) the 2 track on the Master Fader track, then mixdown(bounce)? I hear a difference when moving the pluggins from the 2 track(sounds better i think) than when putting them on the master fader instead. What is the difference,?
__________________
www.myspace.com/therisingdown |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe the volume level, if your mixdown track was not set properly.
Keep in mind that if you bring back to the session the 2 track mix and playing it back as any other regular track in that same session you are runing the mix thru the same plug ins for the second time.
__________________
Camilo Toledo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volume levels are both the same.
Sorry i Mixed through an analog mixer, then brought 2 track back in , and dont have any plugins on that mix..
__________________
www.myspace.com/therisingdown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The majority of times, if you mix with an analog mixer is to have the "excelent analog qualities" of that board. Unless you have a top of the line board it is not recommended to use it the way you did.
Why? (1), you just went outside the digital realm, (2) introduced noise, hum, (3)the poor quality of the mixers pre amps, and (4) came back to digital, with a probable degraded mix. You will be better off just mixing in the box.(ITB) The use of a submaster is common, and useful under certain situations. In some very large sessions, they are useful to differenciate the large sections ( a 20 piece string ensemble, a gospel choir, etc), and called stems, and that facilitates the mixing process. But in our little world and mixing 32 tracks we do not really need to have a submaster and a master. You can avoid this step.
__________________
Camilo Toledo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IT ALSO happens to mixes mixed in protools(not just analog), so I dont think its my board, which always sounds better for some reason than mixing inside protools(even though i reenter those crappy converters)
__________________
www.myspace.com/therisingdown |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, if you a are getting clipping sounds, overloading distortion inside PT, I have so to say that there is something going on in the way you mix, or in the way you record your audio.
The majority of times is human error I am sorry to say it, and please don't get offended. You asked and people will respond. I believe I am giving you good advice and telling you from experience, I will not bother to waste my own time. But at the end it is you who can choose to keep doing things the way you think, the way you want or the way they are supposed to be. Good luck.
__________________
Camilo Toledo |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is delay compensation necessary for Master Fader on Main Outs? | WinTaper | Pro Tools 10 | 1 | 02-19-2014 05:57 AM |
Master fader over loaded on mixdown | converted | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 14 | 01-31-2009 10:30 AM |
Plugins on a mixdown track | paul_g | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 01-27-2008 09:31 PM |
master fader mixdown | jhammer619 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 01-03-2008 02:50 AM |
What are you using on your master fader during mixdown? | H-man | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 12-03-2001 06:45 AM |