Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2002, 10:34 AM
sipi1910 sipi1910 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ga
Posts: 51
Default mbox preamps

how is the quality of the mbox pre amps?

thanks,
wayne
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2002, 10:41 AM
auxsend1 auxsend1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 871
Default Re: mbox preamps

Somewhere between the OO1 and the OO2. Sorry, I know that doesn't help much. I have an MBox, but I don't also have a OO1 handy to compare it to. Of course, you're also talking about different converters as well.

Maybe someone has done a straight up preamp only comparison??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2002, 10:53 AM
vf124 vf124 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Inside Puter
Posts: 1,124
Default Re: mbox preamps

Quote:
Maybe someone has done a straight up preamp only comparison??
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">It's been done...try a DUC search [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
A Blues Harp and PowerBook is all I need ... along with Analog Signature Pack & BlueTubes 3.0 !!

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2002, 01:18 PM
auxsend1 auxsend1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 871
Default Re: mbox preamps

I found
this thread
but I don't think it ever resolved....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2002, 01:36 PM
c_hebb c_hebb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 114
Default Re: mbox preamps

I read that they are the same as the Focusrite Platinum's. Interesting is that when the Mbox was first introduced all the ads boasted it had class A mic preamps. Now they make no more mention of it..., I wonder why?

If I was to guess, now I have no true idea, I'll bet the 002 has the same preamps as the Mbox. But now that's just a guess!

Update:
Well here are some specs on the 002 vs. Mbox's preamps. But I don't know what all is involved in preamp specs:

002,
Mic E.I.N (unweighted):
* Inputs 1-4: -127 dBu @ 65 dB gain, 150 ohm source, 20 Hz — 20 kHz

vs.

Mbox,
Mic E.I.N (unweighted):
*Inputs 1-2: -126 dB @ 40 dB gain, 150 ohm source

Did I lose my bet or is there more to it?
Confused,
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2002, 02:30 PM
sipi1910 sipi1910 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ga
Posts: 51
Default Re: mbox preamps

i appreciate the replies everyone.i havent heard the two but if i was to go by what people are saying i would probably say the mbox sounds better but is limited in its abilities.i guess it all depends on what you specifically need.thanks for the help again.

wayne
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2002, 02:35 PM
ProdInfo ProdInfo is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 338
Default Re: mbox preamps

Quote:
Originally posted by c_hebb:

If I was to guess, now I have no true idea, I'll bet the 002 has the same preamps as the Mbox. But now that's just a guess!
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">The Digi 002 and Mbox do not use the same microphone preamps. The Digi 002 uses a design that is based loosely on the preamps that are found in PRE, our 8-channel, world-class microphone preamp. Mbox uses a design from Focusrite.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2002, 06:22 PM
Egghd Egghd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 39
Default Re: mbox preamps

I have an Mbox and I must say I was very pleased that a $499 box that came with LE software was so well thought out and sounded good. The mic pres are usable.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2002, 11:39 PM
lynxxx lynxxx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: L.A., CA USA
Posts: 316
Default Re: mbox preamps

I have found so far that I got far fatter tracks with(for instance) a Shure SM-58(guitars or vocal) and an old analog mixer in PT-Free, than I am with M-Box pre-amps. It doesn't seem to have any headroom.I have to go past 80% on the M-box input to get signal in the yellow on the screen meters. It's better with my Rode NTK but not what you'd expect from a powered mic. Direct bass isn't too bad but sounds "hollow" not fat. Yes, I'm selecting Mic, Line, Inst settings as is appropriate. Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
__________________
Mbox /PTLE 5.2
G4 QS Dual 1Ghz OS 9.2.2
512mb RAM
80 G Seagate internal HD
60 G IBM Deskstar internal HD
40 G Buslink (Seagate)FW ext.HD
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2002, 01:27 PM
Egghd Egghd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 39
Default Re: mbox preamps

Quote:
I have found so far that I got far fatter tracks with(for instance) a Shure SM-58(guitars or vocal) and an old analog mixer in PT-Free, than I am with M-Box pre-amps.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Going into the 1/8" Mac audio plug??? What happens if you go from that mixer into the selected line input of the MBox?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bypassing mbox 3 preamps Lonefse 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 04-17-2011 05:21 PM
Preamps on MBox gazo 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 08-14-2008 11:16 PM
MBox Preamps Bender 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 10-11-2007 10:09 AM
Mbox Preamps jandw1 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 08-06-2005 08:29 PM
preamps and mbox juicytunes General Discussion 5 01-05-2005 02:01 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com