|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
mbox preamps
how is the quality of the mbox pre amps?
thanks, wayne |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
Somewhere between the OO1 and the OO2. Sorry, I know that doesn't help much. I have an MBox, but I don't also have a OO1 handy to compare it to. Of course, you're also talking about different converters as well.
Maybe someone has done a straight up preamp only comparison?? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
Quote:
__________________
A Blues Harp and PowerBook is all I need ... along with Analog Signature Pack & BlueTubes 3.0 !! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
I read that they are the same as the Focusrite Platinum's. Interesting is that when the Mbox was first introduced all the ads boasted it had class A mic preamps. Now they make no more mention of it..., I wonder why?
If I was to guess, now I have no true idea, I'll bet the 002 has the same preamps as the Mbox. But now that's just a guess! Update: Well here are some specs on the 002 vs. Mbox's preamps. But I don't know what all is involved in preamp specs: 002, Mic E.I.N (unweighted): * Inputs 1-4: -127 dBu @ 65 dB gain, 150 ohm source, 20 Hz — 20 kHz vs. Mbox, Mic E.I.N (unweighted): *Inputs 1-2: -126 dB @ 40 dB gain, 150 ohm source Did I lose my bet or is there more to it? Confused, Chris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
i appreciate the replies everyone.i havent heard the two but if i was to go by what people are saying i would probably say the mbox sounds better but is limited in its abilities.i guess it all depends on what you specifically need.thanks for the help again.
wayne |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
I have an Mbox and I must say I was very pleased that a $499 box that came with LE software was so well thought out and sounded good. The mic pres are usable.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
I have found so far that I got far fatter tracks with(for instance) a Shure SM-58(guitars or vocal) and an old analog mixer in PT-Free, than I am with M-Box pre-amps. It doesn't seem to have any headroom.I have to go past 80% on the M-box input to get signal in the yellow on the screen meters. It's better with my Rode NTK but not what you'd expect from a powered mic. Direct bass isn't too bad but sounds "hollow" not fat. Yes, I'm selecting Mic, Line, Inst settings as is appropriate. Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.
__________________
Mbox /PTLE 5.2 G4 QS Dual 1Ghz OS 9.2.2 512mb RAM 80 G Seagate internal HD 60 G IBM Deskstar internal HD 40 G Buslink (Seagate)FW ext.HD |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: mbox preamps
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bypassing mbox 3 preamps | Lonefse | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 04-17-2011 05:21 PM |
Preamps on MBox | gazo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 08-14-2008 11:16 PM |
MBox Preamps | Bender | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 10-11-2007 10:09 AM |
Mbox Preamps | jandw1 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 08-06-2005 08:29 PM |
preamps and mbox | juicytunes | General Discussion | 5 | 01-05-2005 02:01 PM |