|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#61
|
||||
|
||||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Good day everyone,
I read this post from the start. Oliver may I ask it can really take 5min. to boot ? I did notice switch to APFS taking slightly longer for booting, but so far the workflow is gratifying indeed since switching to APFS. I did CCC my drives and it did inform me that a update is needed for 64bit files. Anyhow if I may inform (YOU'RE ALL GREAT FOLKS *ALL OF YOU), by seeing your names you all been a tremendous help for me and others as well, and I can't thank you all enough for your valuable time and efforts. I work closely with with my communities, Council, City manager, police, fire on a daily basis and I surely get the blow back from all sides. Although my goal is to always be helpful and not hurtful, and trust me that I'm only pertaining this to myself, and not implying such to anyone. I insist that we all keep the GROUP HUGS going, because we all are here to help each other, and everyone everywhere on all forums have a common goal is to help each other. I'm so grateful for all of you folks, and have a great day, and please be safe.
__________________
MAC PRO 2010 5,1 3.46hex 128ram - MONTEREY 12.7.3 - PT 2023.12 / 003 RACK SIGNATURE MOD / DIGIMAX FS / PCM90 2CHANNEL SPDIF
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
For a slow boot try zapping your pram/nvram - hold down the control, option, P and R keys while starting the computer. Hold them down until you here the second startup chime. This might well speed things up.
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Quote:
Long process. Now is trying to figure out which of the three will be my boot, audio, and sampler drive. I know Janne mentioned the OWC SSD Sata bay drive for O.S. since it's the slowest of the drives I have. 1. I think OWC 6G SSD sata II (OS) 2. OWC Accelsior PCIe blade (slightly faster) for my sampler library 3. New Samsung EVO 970 plus for Audio Sound like a winner ? thanks After all worked I will reset the Pram & Pram
__________________
MAC PRO 2010 5,1 3.46hex 128ram - MONTEREY 12.7.3 - PT 2023.12 / 003 RACK SIGNATURE MOD / DIGIMAX FS / PCM90 2CHANNEL SPDIF
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Quote:
Works reasonably well enough for me up to about 80 tracks or so. The only thing that gums up the works is the Baldwin Parlor Grand from WholeSounds (running in UVI Falcon) as that loads a LOT of samples. Slows save times down and is why when I use that I put it in VEPro and decouple it and PT. Depending on what your needs are you might want to look into using VEPro especially if you use the sample instruments in your sessions. Works wonders on a single machine. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Thanks Jack. I'll proceed with the install and see how things work, have a great day all.
__________________
MAC PRO 2010 5,1 3.46hex 128ram - MONTEREY 12.7.3 - PT 2023.12 / 003 RACK SIGNATURE MOD / DIGIMAX FS / PCM90 2CHANNEL SPDIF
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Quote:
Drive Format System Media Notes APFS (Mac) YES NO SSD Only HFS+ (Mac) YES YES --- NTFS (Win) YES YES --- FAT32 (Mac & Win) NO NO Transfer Only In every search i've made on "APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive", I have never found any comment on Avid's own recommendations or requirements for Hard Drive Formatting that Pro Tools Media should Not be on APFS drive. Unless Media is something else than Audio sessions or Sample libraries, why is no one mentioning this in this discussion ? I myself am wondering if I should use my Catalina APFS SSD System drive for future Pro Tools Sessions or continue with my HFS+ external SSD. Any info on this would be most welcome. Thank you. |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
APFS is designed for SSD drives (no moving parts). Any other system is made for spinners.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
I agree that APFS is implemented for SSD drives.
I'm asking why is everyone discussing whether to use APFS or HFS+ format for Pro Tools Audio sessions, without addressing Avid's own requirements indicating "Media on APFS drive : No" ? The following is copied from Avid page on Hard Drive formatting for Pro Tools Sessions : Avid Knowledge Base Hard Drive Formatting with Pro Tools Tested audio drive formats Last Updated : September 9, 2020 Products Affected : Pro Tools, Pro Tools HD, Pro Tools Ultimate Audio Drive Requirements: One or more hard disk drives dedicated for audio record and playback. Audio drives (any drives used with audio recording or playback or transfer) should be formatted HFS+ Journaled (not case-sensitive) for Mac, or NTFS for Windows CAUTION Case sensitive volume formatting is not supported macOS FileVault encryption is not supported Drive Format...........System.........Media............N otes APFS (Mac)..............YES...............NO........... ...SSD Only HFS+ (Mac)..............YES..............YES........... .....--- NTFS (Win)...............YES..............YES.......... ......--- FAT32 (Mac & Win).....NO...............NO..............Transfer Only Supported Drive Type Notes HDD --- SSD Preferred over HDD for System & Media Fusion System drive only NVMe Recommended for high bandwidth video |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
APFS for SSD
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?
Nobody here cares much about what Avid says about APFS. We have been using APFS for years without problems. It is one of the worlds most widely used, most robust, most performant file systems. It's like SSDs themselves, Avid never provided any useful guidance on their use.. ..and their unchanged recommendations to use separate session drives, is beyond stupid in the age of PCIe/NVMe drives and can result in worse performance if followed blindly especially on modern Macs. I don't know how many times I have asked Avid to fix that documentation, I have given up. And what about approved systems? There are few that its practically useless. Do you run on an approved system? Screw that I would follow advice on known good systems from folks on DUC,
Avid is a small, perpetually struggling company. If you want to get stuff done you need to work out what advice from Avid is important (some is very) and what advice to ignore (some is a waste of time). But come on, you just quoted a document that has such embarrassing out of date ******** statements like needing dedicated *hard disk* drives for audio sessions, and the document is self contradictory about SSD vs HDD needs, and you are seriously thinking that document might be more informed than people posting in this thread? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Journaled or Extended... | delaplanemusic | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 04-14-2008 01:35 AM |
Journaled Drive | SteveGarman | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 12-05-2006 01:47 AM |
EXTENDED Vs JOURNALED HD FORMATS | Dual Mackie | Storage Subsystems | 3 | 02-25-2005 04:41 PM |
Mac OsX Extended Journaled Problem | Luis Miguel | Storage Subsystems | 4 | 11-03-2004 07:21 AM |
Format Extended or Extended Journaled for PT6.2.3? | AAR | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 02-06-2004 07:46 AM |