|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Low Latency monitoring
I solved my recording delay while monitoring problem by changing the buffer size to 64 samples.
My question is, when recording at low latency setting, does it effect the recording quality? if so, will changing it to a higher buffer setting correct the quality? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency monitoring
Quote:
Chris
__________________
Help Us Help You ______________________________________ Chris Pro Tools 2024.3 Focusrite LS56 Focusrite Pro40 (3) Slate Digital VRS8 Analogue Tonebuss 24 Channel UAD-2 OCTO Core Accelerator UAD Volt 2 macOS 10.15.7 32 GB DDR4 RAM 4.01GHz Quad-Core Intel Core I7 NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 2 GB |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency monitoring
Agreed^^^with the following exception; if the computer is under powered and you start hearing clicks, pops or other obvious digital "crap" while tracking. But, having said that, I do all my recording at the 64 buffer and have no issues(but I do have a well built/tweaked computer). If I get to a stage of mix where I have lots of plugins and such that I can't run at 64, I bounce a quick ruff mix, import it to the session, line it up with the rest, make most tracks inactive and record(doing this allows me to use the 64 buffer, even though the session may have 100 tracks and dozens of plugins. It also removes latency of ADC compensating for high-latency plugins, which I normally leave inactive during tracking anyway)
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency monitoring
It doesn't bother me now that I am used to it, but I can still hear the latency at 64 samples. It may be barely perceptible but it is there. Good thing I can live with it:)
__________________
GIGABYTE X58A-UD3R, INTEL CORE i7 960, NVIDIA GEFORCE 8400GS, WIN 7, MOTU 896mk3 HYBRID, PT 10.3.2 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Low Latency monitoring
Quote:
Chris
__________________
Help Us Help You ______________________________________ Chris Pro Tools 2024.3 Focusrite LS56 Focusrite Pro40 (3) Slate Digital VRS8 Analogue Tonebuss 24 Channel UAD-2 OCTO Core Accelerator UAD Volt 2 macOS 10.15.7 32 GB DDR4 RAM 4.01GHz Quad-Core Intel Core I7 NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 2 GB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Latency monitoring
What is everyone's Latency settings in the playback engine? I'm not talikng about 64, 128 or those settings, but is your Latency box checked? Delay compensation at max or min? What's a good sample rate for the latency settings? And the cache, is that 4Gb, 6Gb, etc... What's everybody's settings? Other than upping for mixing and lowering for tracking that is, I mean there are more settings in the playback engine. Streaming for audio checked?
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lowest latency without "low latency monitoring" ? | music project | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 05-11-2010 08:40 AM |
Zero Latency Monitoring for 002/003 | Rob Holsman | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 15 | 05-11-2010 08:37 AM |
Low Latency Monitoring in 8.0.3 | rhendee | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 03-08-2010 07:48 PM |
Low Latency Monitoring | RaySoul | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 09-05-2009 03:49 PM |
zero latency monitoring!! | jayq | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 05-26-2006 08:27 AM |