|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
wow....we must have been working in tandem.
traced the problem back to a aux track that mistakenly had a bus send on it set to the same input as the aux track. removed send, Dly went off. all is good. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
FYI, the session doesn't need to be at 96kHz for the problem to arise.
__________________
PT9.0.0, 3.0GHz Mac Pro, OS 10.6.3, 13GB RAM, HD6/Accel, Magma PE6R4, PRE |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
Quick curiosity why you're purposely setting a feeback loop on an aux track?
-tv
__________________
Tim vdB Avid Audio "There's a fine line between stupid and clever." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
Quote:
You can elaborate on this example by having other plug-ins along with the delay, for instance EQ and distortion, on the aux, so that successive echos are increasingly filtered and distorted. Kenny Gioia details this technique in one of his instructional videos, "Using Mono Delays" in his PT Tips & Tricks series. The trick is valuable whenever you are using a time-based effect as it gives you many more choices for processing the feedback than you would have with any single time-based effect plug-in.
__________________
PT9.0.0, 3.0GHz Mac Pro, OS 10.6.3, 13GB RAM, HD6/Accel, Magma PE6R4, PRE |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
Good stuff! Does turning delay comp OFF on that track resolve this workflow issue?
-tv
__________________
Tim vdB Avid Audio "There's a fine line between stupid and clever." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
Quote:
Try it yourself on a session containing only one mono aux track with a send bus pointing back to the aux track's input. Inactivate ADC for that track. The aux track is the only track in the session, yet the red Dly light is still on.
__________________
PT9.0.0, 3.0GHz Mac Pro, OS 10.6.3, 13GB RAM, HD6/Accel, Magma PE6R4, PRE |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
Clarity has finally arrived:
In PT 9 we now notify user of delay compensation feedback loops per the red "dly" (try holding mouse over "dly" and you'll see the details of the condition) Red "dly" = a delay compensation state that we do not handle. Before PT 9, Pro Tools did not have the smarts to detect the feedback chain. Now it does. Hope this clears this up. -tv
__________________
Tim vdB Avid Audio "There's a fine line between stupid and clever." |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
unfortunatly most of the included session templates have effects sends that loop back to themselves through other effects. So that light is always on - not sure what to suggest as it makes it hard to tell when i actually exceed the sample limit - a red "F"? EG:reverb track>delay send>delay track>reverb send.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
I done a test and found using the profire 2626 on a 48khz session my adc longest was the 4k region and lowest was 1k
I put my session to 192khz and the highest samples per channel are 16383 and lowest is 4095. The playback engine buffer size also increases to 2k samples the more I go up in sample size. Pretty cool. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ADC Bug in PTHD 9
What do you know. Double the sample rate doubles the ADC. I did not know that. I work in post and only work at 48k.
Secondly, you are creating a feedback loop. So PT can't compensate for that, it's impossible. That is why the ADC is red. Hope this helps. Best |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When you upgrade from PTHD 9 to PTHD 11... | johnnyv | Pro Tools 11 | 2 | 12-18-2013 01:21 PM |
WTB: PTHD 10 upgrade from PTHD 8 | soul | Buy & Sell | 5 | 01-18-2013 11:20 AM |
Pthd 8 => pthd 10 = €1300 ?!?!?!?! | Bassturbator | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 10-21-2011 06:47 PM |
Pthd 8.11 & osx 10.6.8 | dtmprod | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 09-30-2011 12:01 PM |
What does PTHD Native have over PTHD 9 running Natively? | acmost | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 11-07-2010 12:06 PM |