Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
05-22-2007, 11:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Tracking latency 001 vs. 002, 003?
I've been a long time 001 user with an Apogee Rosetta
200 for AD/DA. I'm thinking of either upgrading to a new 003 & Mac Pro or a used HD1 system and my current G4 1.25 single processor. I never use the low latency feature because of the Apogee. At 128, I have no tracking problems. I just discovered that the 002, because it's firewire, has more latency. Has anybody found this to be a major problem? Anyone with an 003 yet? 
|
|
#2
05-22-2007, 12:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Tracking latency 001 vs. 002, 003?
The 002/003 have buffer settings as low as 64 samples, so you'll be fine if you're used to working at 128.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Old TDM Rig, Tracking Latency Question | football2 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 02-27-2010 07:12 PM |
| Is tracking latency getting better on LE/MP? | autodidactic | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 02-26-2007 08:11 AM |
| low latency tracking with reverb | stevejones | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 11 | 09-06-2005 07:48 PM |
| Tracking Latency | philrecords | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 09-25-2004 12:18 AM |
| Tracking Latency | seawell | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 04-10-2004 10:32 AM |
Linear Mode
