|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Track Count 001 vs 002...
I seem to recall more people getting better performance with the 001 than the 002, is this still true?
__________________
Ill suffer winter alone; ten thousand miles from home... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Track Count 001 vs 002...
Well...its even improving prety soon. I have the 001 and i am expecting to get a new 3200+ Athlon any day now.....
(but i think you're right. The firewire nature of the 002 or the usb nature of the mbox do use up some cpu.....)
__________________
What's that? - That's the machine that goes "pling". Bastiaan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Track Count 001 vs 002...
(let you in on a secret, I just bought a 3500+ 64)
__________________
Ill suffer winter alone; ten thousand miles from home... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Track Count on HD 1 | mohoman | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 01-05-2009 07:25 PM |
PDC and track count | overflow | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 2 | 07-28-2006 11:19 PM |
Track count? | JFreak | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 06-26-2003 06:52 AM |
Track count: G4 PCI vs. G4 AGP | uno1234 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 02-08-2001 01:37 PM |
Max track Count | PeterCole | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 10-26-1999 08:30 AM |