|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Well few months ago we couldn't have imagined that one day we'll see TB working in a cMP, so it's freaking amazing to see it up and running, and better yet, working fine with a TB audio interface!
I wouldn't be surprised if soon enough someone will figure out a way to bypass the windows cold-boot hack...
__________________
Mac Pro, Pro Tools, RME FireFace UFX+ |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Please.....
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Not to hijack the tread but was is the latest OS can install on an 2012 cMP 5.1 without changing anything inside like to run Mojave?
__________________
What is more relaxing than Music? Pro Tools Carbon for macOS 12.7.4 My HDX for Windows11. Gigabyte Z490 Vision D - BIOS F21b Intel Core I9 10850K Windows11 / macOS 12.7.4 Hackintosh / 32GB of Rams Avid Carbon/HDX 2024.3 Ultimate - 8x8x8 HD I/O - PT Dock - PT Control - Artist Mix (1) Universal Audio Apollo Twin|X - UAD2 Pci-E and Satellite USB Octo v.11.0.1 - SOLO 610 - Twin-finity Bricasti M7 (2) Lexicon PCM96 Neumann KH805 - KH310 Yamaha NS-10M Avantone Mixcubes Grace Design M905 Etc, etc, etc. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Quote:
For Mojave as you know you need to change out the video card and that's easy. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Quote:
and are there still some issues with the minis and Usb making them unsuitable for music? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
I thought the usb bug (audio clicks and pops with USB Interfaces) was fixed in Mojave 10.14.4
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Quote:
B |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
"Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?"
that is a 10 year old computer dude!!!!! save your pennies or use a CC and at least buy a new or recent MINI.
__________________
__________________ Al Hospers bassist, vocal, composer, engineer https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCw...ogfR_7Q/videos ------------------------------------------------------ PT2023.12, OS X Monterey, Late 2013 MacPro, 6 core, 64 GB RAM, Orion Studio, Slate Raven MTi2, ISA428, ADL600, Distressor, Grace 501, Dimedio, Obsidian, One LA, BAC500, Harrison 32 EQ, UAD2 OCTO, Focal 6 be, Auratones... |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Also don`t forget that the SATA port are SATA II and not SATA III so to get the 500 mb/s you will need a card like the apricorn but you will loose a PCIe slot
__________________
Your eyes can deceive you don't trust them , Mix with your ears |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac Pro 5,1 2009 with Xeon 12-core a good choice?
Other than not having a Thunderbolt port there's not a thing wrong with a cheesegrater Mac. Plenty of life and power in those old machines and with a video card upgrade they're more than capable on running Mojave. Put the system drive on an ssd on a pcie card to help things along. And you still have a slot for an ssd for samples and/or PT to record to.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAC PRO 8 CORE 2.26 (Nehalem 2009) 4.1 ANY GOOD WITH HD NATIVE | karljohnson | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 4 | 11-14-2011 09:50 PM |
Which Mac Pro for HD Native? 2008 8 Core or 2009 Quad Core? | sws2h | Pro Tools 10 | 6 | 11-03-2011 03:23 PM |
2010 iMac 27" i7 quad VS 2009 MacPro 2.66 Xeon | sweetness | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 11-27-2010 11:01 PM |
2009 Quad or 2009 8-Core Nehalem? | psmworld | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 8 | 04-08-2010 03:18 AM |
mac pro quad core or 8 core xeon nehalem? | grendizer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 20 | 02-17-2010 12:30 PM |