Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2002, 12:11 AM
peter parker peter parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 175
Default Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

can someone please explain to me what, and how these work???!!!

stereo track, mono track, stereo interleaved???

what is each one, what does it do, and how is it used??? Please help me get a grasp on things. [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2002, 12:13 AM
peter parker peter parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 175
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

I'm working with samples, guitars, vocals.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-20-2002, 12:27 AM
Bastiaan Bastiaan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nederland
Posts: 6,916
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

You think to complicated. [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]

Mono is mono, and stereo is stereo. Protools calls normal stereo-files stereo-interleaved. So that is what you should choose in your bounce to disk if you want an ordinary stereo-file....

A stereo-track holds 2 mono-tracks. If you use the "import to track" method, protools will first convert your stereo-interleaved file to 2 mono-files.....and put them on the stereo-track

A mono-track can become stereo, if you add a plugin that will output in stereo, like reverbs, delays etc.
__________________
What's that?
- That's the machine that goes "pling".


Bastiaan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-20-2002, 12:51 AM
CCash CCash is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,423
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

Yeah sort of like that. A mono bounce SUMS the tracks - anything panned left or right. This is important!!! Because the bounced file will be hotter than you're hearing or seeing. To test this, set all of your outputs to output 1 only... you'll see how much hotter. Or try bouncing a stereo mix as mono and import it back into your session. Check it out. It's hotter than your stereo master fader showed.

More mono info: A single track set to a mono output will be 2.5 dB hotter than a track set to the 1-2 (stereo) outs. Also, if you pan a mono track to the left or right, it will increase 2.5 dB (whereas most consoles will LOWER the channel's output when it is panned center (mono). If you pan hard left or right it will then come to "full level".

That's mono. Stereo separated with the .L and .R extension will be two separate files. Some programs, like Jam, can deal with these. They look for the .R of the same name when you drag in a .L Use these when you know you're going to use it in Pro Tools again -- like if you're going bounce then master in a new session.

Stereo interleaved "blends" the .L and .R into a single, stereo file. Pro Tools - like Bastiaan said, needs to split these out to .L and .R when it imports stereo interleaved. Stereo interleaved is the standard, generic format for most applications like Toast. A stereo MP3, for example, is a single file... basically a stereo interleaved.

[img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-20-2002, 01:20 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

While split stereo files use approximately 200% hard disk i/o performance compared to mono files, interleaved stereo files need only 150%.
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2002, 09:43 PM
accession accession is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the road again... (Australia)
Posts: 1,319
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

Quote:
Originally posted by Kickin.da.speaker:
While split stereo files use approximately 200% hard disk i/o performance compared to mono files, interleaved stereo files need only 150%.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Are sure about that one? [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

Say a mono minute's worth of silence takes up around 5MB, while two mono tracks would be 10MB.

But the two tracks combined as an interleaved stereo file would be 7.5MB???

Where does the 2.5MB go?

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-20-2002, 11:16 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

No, the space occupied on the hard drive is the same, still 10Mb. Only instead of having to read two 5Mb at the same time, your DAW now only has to read one 10Mb file. While the data throughput is exactly the same, the stress on the hard disk is lowered (I guess due to the way the data is organized on a HD).

The previous message I posted is an exact quote from Emagic's Logic Audio's manual.
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-21-2002, 12:31 AM
Freeheel Freeheel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 322
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

CDs use interleaved stereo files too, so if you are burning a file that you have created on protools, you have to make it interleaved before you transfer it into Toast.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-21-2002, 10:15 PM
peter parker peter parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 175
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

when should i use mono, and when should i use stereo interleaved in the mix?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-21-2002, 10:17 PM
peter parker peter parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 175
Default Re: Stereo track vs. Mono track vs. Stereo Interleaved track >>>>>>>>>>>

what goes to what audio file?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conver stereo track to SINGLE mono track markolone Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) 1 07-30-2010 07:09 PM
How can I turn a stereo track into a mono track??? LitheVite 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 11-18-2007 02:51 AM
Mono track to Stereo, is that possible? Daniel P 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 08-25-2003 01:20 PM
Dragging a stereo track to a mono track duanebonney 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 09-22-2002 08:17 AM
can you not copy automation data from a mono track to a stereo track? Felix Tips & Tricks 5 04-09-2002 06:32 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com