Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 08:14 PM
youbringmesuffering youbringmesuffering is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 78
Default Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

if i'm working on a track in PTLE and trying to line up 4 separate drum audio tracks, BD/SD/Room/OH to a rhythmic synth sound that was sequenced in reason. would it be better to allign them with beat detective or elastic audio? I can see the benefits of both but i just can't seem to get everything to sync. Frustrating.

this is NOT an emergency or urgent.
__________________
Jose
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2009, 11:43 PM
tamasdragon tamasdragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 2,190
Default Re: Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

For me usually to correct drum performances, elastic audio is the way to go. I usually do it with an algorithm, and than render it with x-form, which takes some time, but the results are worth the wait.
But, if the performance is very off the grid, beatdetective may give you better result than elastic audio. Because if you use ea at it's extreme, than you will most likely to get many artifacts from it. Although if it is really about correcting, I like ea more than beatdetective. Ea is giving me faster and greater results in that case.
Tamas Dragon
__________________
my blog:Tamas Dragon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2009, 02:52 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

The best way is doing it manual with fades. I do use beat detective alot of the time (lazy), but I usually have to go over manually to clean up things that beat detective messes up.

After some bad experiences with EA with PT7.4 (when it was first introduced i think) hogging up CPU resources and giving me poor results I have not been using it much since.

I actually did try it yesterday on a picking guitar track. The CPU hogging seems to have gone, but it changed parts of the track creating a wobbling effect wich I defenetly don't want.
It also creates yet another session folder called rendered files, and I don't like that. To many files and folders to keep track of + session load slower.
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-18-2009, 03:59 AM
The Dougfather The Dougfather is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,199
Default Re: Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

Beat detective will maintain phase whereas elastic won't, hence why elastic is not much use for drums and the results are wobbly at best.

Beat detective is great but not simple and requires practice, there are some pretty good tutorials out there. Also, you'll need the MPTK2 to beat detective over multiple tracks, it's a cost agreed but one that IMHO any serious Pro tools user should have. Try working in sections rather trying to take in whole songs, thats where it can easily go wrong.

If you use elastic, duplicate the track and then when you have finished your elastic edits commit them to disk and a new region will be created. The will eliminate the CPU resource issue.
__________________
iMac i5 2.8GHz, Macbook Pro 2.4GHz, Pro Tools 10/11, MOTU 828mk2, Presonus Digimax FS, Presonus Firestudio Project, TC Konnekt 24D
---
iCON Photography
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2009, 04:15 AM
trondned trondned is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 72
Default Re: Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

I never had problems with elastic audio not being phase-coherent. I've never tried it to extremes, though. Usually I have the drummer playing to the click, and then I just quantize 50%, and it usually locks in tight. What's important is to group the tracks before you start doing anything. If you just stretch one track at a time you're in a mess
__________________
Trond Nedberg
Nedberg Audio
Kongensgate 16
0153 Oslo
Norway

Nedberg Audio
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 07:18 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Beat Detective vs. elastic audio

Just to add, I always use BD on short regions at time (verse, bridge, chorus), and not on the whole track at once. For me it's much easier to se where BD goes wrong doing it this way. Then I crossfade and consolidate that region (Shift + Alt + 3)
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beat Detective vs. Elastic Audio vs. What? Quinn9 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-15-2011 07:57 PM
Beat Detective vs Elastic Audio TDub 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 07-15-2010 03:27 PM
Using Beat detective and elastic audio together Kourquie Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 04-19-2010 01:55 PM
Beat Detective vs. Elastic Audio Tobias Eichelberg Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 03-20-2009 11:16 AM
003 using beat detective and elastic audio teddyroberson 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 08-06-2008 09:44 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com