|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apple M1 Benchmarks
Early benchmarks for Apple’s new M1 chip.
https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks Looks mighty impressive for entry level Macs, especially single core performance. Half as fast again as a Mac Pro 7.1 16 core!
__________________
Dave Marsden UK |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Thanks for that, Dave.
Mighty impressive indeed. That's a lot of power for the money. Had it not been for PT not being ready for it, I'd be ordering one right away.
__________________
Mac mini M2 16GB RAM macOS 13.4.1. PT Studio 2023.6. Topping E30 II DAC, Dynaudio BM6, 2 x Artist Mix, SSL UC1, Control on iPad. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Just not enough memory, although you cannot directly conpare architectures like that. But 16GB is not enough yet, and they still lack USB4/TB4 inless I am mistaken
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Quote:
Still, it depends on your needs. For me, using mostly audio tracks, small sessions, 16gb works just fine. Large sessions, lots of sampled VIs and such, you quickly need more. When I'll be needing next generation USB/TB, I don't know. I guess that is not in the near future.
__________________
Mac mini M2 16GB RAM macOS 13.4.1. PT Studio 2023.6. Topping E30 II DAC, Dynaudio BM6, 2 x Artist Mix, SSL UC1, Control on iPad. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
After last transition (PPC/Intel) it took fourth MP to perfect the design. Just need to be patient. Maybe this time things go faster as they already have the Rosetta technology available, can focus on hardware
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Quote:
—- These are impressive single core numbers, measuring a big core performance. But remember these synthetic benchmarks give a pretty narrow slice of performance info, and that these big.LITTLE Arm architecture systems have very different big and LITTLE core performance. And the M1 has four big cores. Still the multi core performance is not bad, but I want to see what silicon comes next with more big cores and a different thermal design point, maybe external DRAM?, more PCIe expansion?, and maybe external GPU support? Wether Apple can/would respin an M1 with more than 16GB is a hot question. It might be a thermal goals and cost constraints at the moment, cost maybe more an issue if it’s true the higher end M1 SKU uses LDDDR5 memory. But shows you what focused engineering can do, and that TSMC can fab these pieces of magic at 5nm is a reminder of how broken Intel is. Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 11-17-2020 at 02:38 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Quote:
As SoC progresses (not just Apple but Qualcomm, Intel and AMD) the way in which we refer to processors and workloads will change. Specs like clock speed and RAM will be subordinated to throughputs of workloads. That's largely already happened with phones and tablets. Were there more gigs happening (or any gigs for some) I'd have picked up an Air in the first round. I'd still not use it in production for anything Avid or Adobe. They aren't supporting it directly now so there is no telling what's lurking underneath once it gets loaded up with scores of plugs and tracks, VIs, the works.
__________________
What happens in Vegas, we make happen... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
A nice M1 review here https://www.anandtech.com/show/16252...pple-m1-tested
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
And another - (direct quote)
“Apple M1 MacBook Pro Benchmarks Are In And They Are Crazy!” https://www.pro-tools-expert.com/pro...eid=070aa82ed2
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3 * SSL UC-1 * Digidesign Command 8 * TECH 21 SansAmp 2.0 * Xvive U3 2.4Ghz Wireless Microphone * Shure SM57 & Rode NT2-A * Fender 30 & Champ 12 valve amps * M-Audio Axiom Pro 49 * PreSonus Speakers & Monitor Station V2 * Lenovo W520 laptop Type 427637U (32 GB RAM) with extra-Ports Dock + SSDs: 2 @ Samsung T5 + 1 @ Samsung T7 * 3 Screens: 15.6” Laptop + 24” BENQ GL2450-B + Samsung 27” CT550 curved Monitor * best Wife! |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Apple M1 Benchmarks
Quote:
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Benchmarks in this forum | detroitkruk | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 15 | 10-21-2007 09:16 PM |
Sandra benchmarks | red tape | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 11-07-2006 12:44 AM |
HD1, 2 or 3? - benchmarks? | Tom Erbe | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 7 | 10-20-2004 06:38 AM |
Apple caught cheating with new G5 benchmarks! | vonbleak101 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 70 | 06-30-2003 04:33 AM |
Apple accused of cheating G5 Benchmarks | strunz0 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 9 | 06-27-2003 03:37 PM |