Avid Native PCIe Card

[JFreak]

Originally Posted by musicman691

Can any person figure out what PBS (aka PhatBeatStudio) is trying to say?

He's reasoning that having two HDN systems works for him better than having single HDX system

[groundcontrol]

Originally Posted by P,B,S

....

Since i dont need all those plugins.
I can up the sample rate from 96k to 192k
there by increasing the sample resolution 100%

half as many tracks per computer at an increased sample rate should be exactly the same processing as it is in 32 bit.

That should leave approximately 250% extra per computer allowing 192k sample rates to finally be feasible both in track count and in plugin performance and resources. Not to mention V,Is

....

Could you explain what exactly it is you'd be able to capture by working at such specs that you find missing from your productions now?

Curious in how this relates to VI tracks.

[musicman691]

Originally Posted by JFreak

He's reasoning that having two HDN systems works for him better than having single HDX system

That I can understand but it was what he was saying and how he was saying it - his numbers weren't making any kind of sense.

[musicman691]

Originally Posted by P,B,S

Well since you are making problems for me heres one for you.


WHO EVER YOU ARE YOU ARE A FAKE IMPOSTER ON THIS SITE.
You do not live in N,J and from your comments Id bet 20$ you know me personnally


FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE

Believe me I'm not the one making problems for you as you are doing that all by yourself.

Lived in NJ all my life.

And anybody who's been around here for any length of time knows exactly who and what PhatBeatStudio was and is.

[P,B,S]

Originally Posted by groundcontrol

Could you explain what exactly it is you'd be able to capture by working at such specs that you find missing from your productions now? .

As a person who,s utmost concern is making audio sound its best,
I would prefer the highest resolution possible.

Originally Posted by groundcontrol

Curious in how this relates to VI tracks.

If you requier X amount of VI,s for a song than with 2 systems in sync
its X divided by 2

Leaving alot of processing left over for other tasks or just system stability.

[P,B,S]

Originally Posted by musicman691

Believe me I'm not the one making problems for you as you are doing that all by yourself.

Lived in NJ all my life.

And anybody who's been around here for any length of time knows exactly who and what PhatBeatStudio was and is.

If everyperson on here knows who I am personnally , than this forum is a sham and a total waist of time.

I come here to learn about audio, but in all honesty the only thing this forum has to offer is in my trusty 1200 page manual.

Im the most straight up person you will ever meet.
Its only the people that screw around that get the gears from me and to those people, " Game on "
I can play to. Im unemployed now Iv lots of time for games.
Iv a shelf full of trophies I won playing games, Im pretty good at them if Im FORCED to play.

[JFreak]

Originally Posted by P,B,S

I would prefer the highest resolution possible. (...) Leaving alot of processing left over for other tasks or just system stability.

If system stability is what you want, then why not keep the HDX as it offloads everything else except your VI's. The host CPUs can surely keep up with the VI demands, right?

But sure, if that's not enough for you just go for multiple HDNs, it's doable. IF that is what you require, then that is what you should get.

Whatever gets you great results is a fine decision.

[musicman691]

Originally Posted by P,B,S

If everyperson on here knows who I am personnally , than this forum is a sham and a total waist of time.

I come here to learn about audio, but in all honesty the only thing this forum has to offer is in my trusty 1200 page manual.

Im the most straight up person you will ever meet.
Its only the people that screw around that get the gears from me and to those people, " Game on "
I can play to. Im unemployed now Iv lots of time for games.
Iv a shelf full of trophies I won playing games, Im pretty good at them if Im FORCED to play.

Thing is we don't play your games. You're far from the most straight up person anyone will ever meet, then again that depends on what you mean by straight up (i.e. that can be taken to be either a nice guy or a putz). You've shown who you are on more than just a few occasions. And truthfully, the few times you ask sensible questions the answers ARE in the manual/users guide. If you think all the forum has to offer is in that then you're sadly mistaken.

Not surprised you're unemployed.

[Drew Mazurek]

Originally Posted by JFreak

If system stability is what you want, then why not keep the HDX as it offloads everything else except your VI's. The host CPUs can surely keep up with the VI demands, right?

But sure, if that's not enough for you just go for multiple HDNs, it's doable. IF that is what you require, then that is what you should get.

Whatever gets you great results is a fine decision.

Let's try to stay on topic.

This is good advice if you think you'll make use of that DSP. Me? I wouldn't (my core tools aren't AAX DSP) and therefore the market value of the HDX card would free up resources for other things.

To PBS, if you're doing pop, rock, hip hop, r&b, basically anything "modern" then 16/44.1 is all you REALLY need and I'd concentrate on making KICK A*S records at this rate, then move up and see if you realize any gains. Just my 2 cents.