|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pro\'s: 96 or 192 Through ADAT in on 192?
Is anybody experienced at using multiple tracks (tos/link) from the adat ins to record higher sample rates such as 96 or 192? Friend has the new mackie onyx and wants to connect to a 192 which has been expanded with the digi in card. Onyx has two adat outs which mirror at 44/48, and split at 96 so 1-4 comes out of one and 5-8 come out of the other. at 192 1-2 comes out of one and 3-4 out of the other.
Basically how does it work, and have your experiences been positive? kind regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro\'s: 96 or 192 Through ADAT in on 192?
Using the ADAT inputs on the digital I/O card of the 192 will accept up to 48 kHz sample rates and convert them to a PT session running up to 192 kHz. So the only way to get 8 channels from the Onyx800R, I'm assuming this is the Onyx you are talking about, into PT on sample rates over the 48 kHz is to use the AES/EBU digital out on the Onyx and digital in on the 192. This is how I had to do it. Something to remember is you will need a custom made cable to go from the Onyx to the 192 as pin out is different on each unit. Hope this helps.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro\'s: 96 or 192 Through ADAT in on 192?
makes total sense, thanks for the quick response and the guidance.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To all the pro's out there... | Remco | Tips & Tricks | 18 | 04-02-2011 09:38 AM |
Anyone try the new Mac Pro's yet? | johnnyv | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 11 | 08-17-2010 09:32 PM |
How the Pro's do it? | ochet | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 10 | 01-18-2005 12:15 AM |
Q for Pro's : EMT 251 ou 252 to buy ? | Aquarius | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 05-21-2004 06:47 AM |
ADAT vs 8 channel D\A w\lightpipe, pro's & cons. | audio junkie | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 08-26-2002 12:22 AM |