|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digibase versus Soundminer
I'm a mixer, not an editor, so this may be a truly ignorant question. But here it goes... Why do editors seem to prefer Soundminer to Digibase in PT? If I find I need an effect during a mix, I type the name into the search window and all the appropriate sounds come up to be auditioned and dragged into the session. I can even spot it to a place in the timeline if I drag and hold down "control". What does Soundminer add to this? I've even read posts where people talk about using iTunes. Is that better than Digibase?
Just curious.
__________________
Charles Dayton, CAS Twisted Avocado Post Audio http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0206743/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
It's adds organization features, and is about 100 times faster then DB and you can search Boolean.
Those are the reasons, but SM actually does a lot more as well. Peace, Brandon
__________________
Brandon Howlett Vibe Audio Post, Inc. Re-recording Mixer Custom Build CPU, HDX 1, Omni, 192 I/O Digital S6 M10 24 fader Satellite Mac Pro, HDNative, 192 I/0 Black Magic HD Extreme |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Ever tried to audition multi-channel split-files in Digibase? .....It´s not possible
Ever tried to control the playback volume when auditioning from DigiBase?....not possible Ever tried to audition your library with your PT-Session interlocked in sync? Ever checked if the long descriptions show up in Digibase when dragging a sound from iTunes to PT? Ever tried to preview plug-ins before spotting your sound with or without the effect to a track? Ever tried to audition your MS-Stereo sounds in L/R-Stereo and then decide if you want to spot them as L/R or discrete MS? Ever wanted to spot just a single channel of an embedded multi-channel sound to PT? Ever wanted to sum your stereo-sound to mono when spotting? Ever tried to batch rename meta-data to maintain your library in Digibase? Ever tried to share your libraries over a network? Play them back from one central server? I could go on but so far for just a few examples. frank.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Quote:
2) Go to your prefs and set "sum to mono when checked" (can´t recal the exact name) And check the "mono"-button under the waveform window. Hit "S" and soundminer will sum your sound to mono and spot to a mono-track. If you unceck the setting in the prefs SM will just spot the left channel to PT. frank.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Right, thanks.
I guess the one I really always wished for was one that would put a mono track onto a stereo track. It would be a lot easier than having to remember if I was on a mono or stereo track, and is this a mono or stereo sfx . . . I guess ideally PTs would have to communicate to SM what kind of track was waiting to be sent an audio file and for SM to accomodate the target regardless of original format. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Quote:
Not sure if this is what you want. frank.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
No what happens to me all the time is that I am typically on a stereo track and find a mono sfx in my library, spot it and of course it is only on one half of the stereo track.
Then I either have to find it in the region bin and drag it to a mono track, or if i realize it before I spot it, switch back to PTs go to a mono track switch back to SM and then spot. It's just a tedious time wasting exercise either way. If SM knew it was a stereo track target, and it could spot the mono fx as a dual mono onto the stereo track that would be ideal, but it's just my imagination running away with me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Just select the region on the stereo-track hit "x" move the selection to a monotrack hit "v".
Spot a dual-mono sound to a stereo-track? hm. Have you tried to de-select "spot to stereo-stream" in the prefs? frank.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digibase versus Soundminer
Hi. I am trying to convince my boss the get Soundminer as we still use one copy of mTools. I am sure they must have this feature in Soundminer, but in mTools, you can create a Pull List of everything you are looking for at once. This way, you don't find one sound and wait for the conversion; you pull all your sounds into a list and then send them when you are done.
Also, you can spot things precisely to your timeline as opposed to dragging them in from Digibase. - Peter |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DigiBase and Soundminer Ripper | CLee | Post - Surround - Video | 4 | 11-11-2003 06:15 PM |
DIgiBase Pro or Mtools/SoundMiner etc. | NK | Post - Surround - Video | 4 | 10-18-2003 07:42 PM |
Mac G4 versus G5 versus Windows XP | progress88 | General Discussion | 22 | 09-08-2003 08:45 AM |