|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digi 003 Control Surface Mackie Control Mode
Digi, Will you ever update the firmware in Digi 003 to using Mackie control Protocol. I own the Digi 003 but that Midi Mode really sucks as a control protocol. It M-Audio included HUI with Projectmix I/O why can't digi do the same for the 003.
You guys already have the money from my purchase. STOP LOCKING DOWN YOUR PRODUCT. You will loose customer base. Alot of my fellow producers purchased Apple Logic 8 because of my advice. Even with PT8, Logic still give more bang for the bucks with the VI, Plugins and unlimited Tracks counts, OMF, AFF and all the time code one needs. It is only a matter of time. I think you guys are smarter than that. Look at my post back in Feb of this Year, I was the one that complained about the features you just added to PT8 so lets see what is next.
__________________
Apple 8 Core, Protools LE 8. M-Powered 7.4, MBOX 2 Pro, MBOX Mini & Micro, Digidesign 003 Factory Surface. Apple Logic Studio Pro 9. www.stratfordtownstudios.com [email protected] |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Control Surface For Protools 10 Mackie Pro Control or Avid Artist Control | lberrios1962 | Pro Tools 10 | 18 | 05-26-2012 12:51 AM |
Help with Mackie Surface Control in PT 9 | Panacci | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 03-14-2011 08:09 PM |
Mackie Control Universal or Tascam 1082 for control surface? | anders | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 05-28-2007 06:12 AM |
Digi 002 or Mackie MCU Surface Control? | ShakaBrah | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 02-15-2005 03:32 AM |
Digi 002 Control Surface vs. Mackie Control | damonmenne | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 05-31-2003 11:58 PM |