![]() |
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am using UAD cards, so I have to care about plugin delay compensation and I don't have a solution for this - very common - scenario:
- 1 audio track - 1 aux track - a send of the audio track routes to the aux track - the aux track has a delaying plugin inserted => the aux track's signal comes late by the amount of the plugin delay. The only workaround that comes to my mind is duplicating the audio track, inserting the plugin on the second track, delaying the first audio track by the plugin delay amount (e.g. Time adjuster) and adjusting the mix of those two with the track faders instead of the send fader (which is not used anymore). The root of my problem is that sends are post-insert (good!) and I have no chance anymore to delay this track's signal (other that routing this to a bus and delaying that one, which I think is way oversized). How do you delay-compensate this scenario? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, "oversized" it is
Create 2 busses: Dry and EFXCreate these tracks: 1 audio track - output = dry bus, send 1 = efx busTime adjuster plugin is set to the worst (biggest) delay of any tracks in your session All audio tracks that have 0 delay get routed to the "DRY" aux track, which is effectively an unaffected, delay compensated submix. Parallel effects auxes, like the one for your UAD, may need to also have a time adjuster plugin inserted.. Example: (I am making up numbers here) An aux for the UAD has 1024 samples of delay An aux with a different reverb plugin has 512 samples of delay In this case the UAD is the worst offender, so that aux does not need a time adjuster. The other reverb only delays the signal by 512, so you have to bump up the total to 1024 by having a time adjuster set to 512 after the reverb plugin. Your dry aux in this case would be set to 1024, equal to the delay of the UAD aux. If you have plugins on individual tracks that cause delay, then you should use a time adjuster on each of those individually to bring the total up to 1024. You can't send these to the dry aux cause then they would have 1024 + the delay from the plugins on that track.. If you have a plugin on a track that causes delay, and then you are using the send to the delayed aux... Well I'm not sure with that one.. ![]() If this isn't making sense, then watch these videos: http://www.screencast.com/users/peed...ders/tutorials In fact, watch them anyway, because they show you three different methods for determining the actual delay on a track. Sometimes this is not what the track is reporting... Russ has a video too: http://duc.digidesign.com/showthread.php?t=260871 At the end, he shows a session with liquidmix, which should be very similar to your UAD...
__________________
MacPro3ghz, 6GB, 10.7.5, PT10.3.2, Digi002 factory/toolkit2/PTIEP, 11R |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanx to flommer for that detailled explanation. I already thought that it wouldn't be easy, but at least now I know how to do it (or to avoid it ;-)).
One of your best tips is probably printing some FX to alternate playlists. Helps a lot in keeping things easy and helps with my "unable to commit to a mix"-syndrome as well ;-) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Delay from Inserts, How to compensate | CisumBlue | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 12 | 01-24-2010 08:47 AM |
How do you pros compensate delay | Fastermouse | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 36 | 11-01-2009 01:55 PM |
Compensate for Delay question | Raggi | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 10-30-2007 06:13 AM |
How to Delay Compensate PTLE 7 | scar97 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 05-30-2006 11:20 AM |
How to compensate for midi delay | surchur | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 07-02-2001 10:16 AM |