|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stereo vs. mono reverb
Can anyone tell me what it is that makes stereo reverb sound so different from mono reverb?
Thanks, John Link |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
Well... not to be too obvious, but one is in stereo and one is mono. To be a little more technical, there is phasing in the stereo reverb which more effectively replicates space.
__________________
-Charles D. Ballard, M.P.S.E. "I bent my wookie" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
I would say a stereo reverb gives you a 3 dimensional (is someone going to tell me it's only 2 dimensional?) sense of space. This is often referred to as some type of room - like typical settings might be 'hall' or 'cathedral' on your home cinema system. A good reverb will mimic more than just the size of a room, but also how 'live' the various surfaces are. An excellent reverb will go even further - convolution reverbs use 'convolution samples' (all done very technically) from real spaces, often famous venues (so they claim) to capture the feel of what it is like to be there. The downside is that a stereo reverb can smear the stereo image of your instruments, particulary if you start using multiple instances on several instruments. So it can often be legit to just use mono reverbs and place the stereo image where the original instrument is. But writing this I realise just how huge the holes in my knowledge on this are. Should you use a convolution reverb later in the mix? Be interesting to hear what other folks' techniques on using reverbs might be... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
Quote:
__________________
Bazzle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
If you are working with multiple reverbs, it can help in preventing a blurring effect to gate some of them and to have a pre-delay on some.
cerberus |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
Yeah Bazboy.. beside, reverb is old school..
a
__________________
cheers, Andrew W7 pro 64_i7 3930K_16GB_ Nuendo 6.5.4-7.1.3 / PT 12.4 ------Mac Mini OSX Lion_PT 10.xx Allen&Heath GS R-24M_ full rack of vintage analog boxes _UAD2_Nugen_iZotope_Melda_Waves_Plugin Alliance_DMG and more 2.0 and 5.1 monitoring |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
It occurs to me that we may have not answered the original question - perhaps he meant 'why is a mono reverb still regarded as mono when you can pan it in a stereo mix?' The answer is that all the infromation from a mono reverb has no stereo information, no 'roominess'. If you pan it to a specific position all the information is panned there too - there is nothing to suggest that you are in a room.
For example, if you wanted to accurately recreate the sound of an electric guitarist with one practice amp sitting in a cathedral, you might pan him to the centre, then use Guitar Rig (or some such similar amp modeller) set to mono as a plug in. You might set the plug to have some reverb on it because that's the way a lot of guitarists set their amps. That all stays in mono, panned to the centre, because in this example that's where his amp is, next to him. So, that gives you him, his guitar, and his amp with its reverb in the centre, but no sense of what's around him. To do that you might then add a convolution reverb, which is in full stereo, to the final result to create the 'cathedral' he's in. This will add info about sound bouncing back from the walls, and will give a sense of space. That's the theory, just to demonstrate the difference mono and stereo reverb, but in a recording studio I doubt anyone actually does it quite like that because you try not to have reverbs on top of reverbs because it can sound messy, and anyway Guitar Rig left in stereo is kind of awsome. That was long winded... |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
Quote:
__________________
Justice C. Bigler www.justicebigler.com Lenovo P50: quad-core i7-6820hq, 64GB, 2TB SSD, Win 10 Pro / Protools Ultimate 2023.6 / HD|Native-TB 2018 MacBook Pro: six-core i9, 32GB, 1TB, Monterey / Protools Studio 2023.6, / DVS / DAR, L-ISA Studio Home/mobile: Focusrite Red 8Pre+HD32R / Clarett 4Pre Road/hotel: Roland OctaCaputre / Apogee One |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stereo vs. mono reverb
One Thing I noticed about the Digidesign Reverb... Phase PROBLEM ! (DVerb)
- I used the middle/side mic technique when recording a tamborine overdub. - I made my own M/S decoder by panning the Side track hard left and also sending it to an Aux input that was panned hard right. I then put an EQ plugin on the Aux channel just to use the phase reversal. - I wanted the tamborine to be compressed with the other drums and percission so I routed all 3 to the Stereo Drum Buss Aux that I had already set up. (Middle Channel, SIde Channel, and the Phased Aux) I then noticed that my side channels of the tamborine disapeared!!!!! I had a stereo DVerb plugin on my Drum Buss. After some experimenting, I discovered that the DVerb was the culprit!!! Using a Dual Mono DVerb instead on the Drum Buss gave a similar reverd effect without canceling out my M/S stereo image. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stereo Aux vs Mono Aux and Turning that Mono into stereo via a stereo Plugin | JesseF | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 10 | 02-14-2010 09:01 AM |
Need advice on when to use mono vs. stereo reverb | TFL | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 03-01-2007 11:08 PM |
stereo or mono reverb for drums? whats the norm? | keithl | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 10 | 01-28-2005 04:10 PM |
Bussing reverb - stereo or mono? | MidnightFlyer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 06-16-2003 02:34 AM |
bouncing:goes mono,only reverb stays stereo.WHY? | odysseys | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 05-18-2001 12:19 AM |