Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2008, 01:55 PM
tim carter tim carter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 318
Default Thinking of upgrading to HD

I've been using 002R for a long time, with issues, but for the most part I've done alot of good records with it... I'm thinking of upgrading to HD to get rid of some of the issues I've had (buffer, latency etc.)... I never really do anything over 16 trks, I use a Rosetta 800, so I do 8 digital and the rest analog... My question is: what are all the HD components needed? Would the 190 I/O suffice me? Please advise... thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2008, 02:24 PM
O.G. Killa's Avatar
O.G. Killa O.G. Killa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,152
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim carter View Post
I've been using 002R for a long time, with issues, but for the most part I've done alot of good records with it... I'm thinking of upgrading to HD to get rid of some of the issues I've had (buffer, latency etc.)... I never really do anything over 16 trks, I use a Rosetta 800, so I do 8 digital and the rest analog... My question is: what are all the HD components needed? Would the 190 I/O suffice me? Please advise... thanks
Well, if you have the Rosetta 800, just buy the X-HD card from Apogee. That way your apogee takes the place of the 192 IO. Then all you need is the Protools Cards/Software. HD1 is one core card. HD2|Accel is a core card plus one additional Accel DSP card. HD3|Accel is Core and Two Accel cards.

If you are only doing 16 tracks, I would say an HD1 will be sufficient. You can always buy an additional Accel card later and add it to your system.

Once you get the HD1. The Core card plugs into your PCI or PCIe slot inside your computer...then the X-HD card from the rosetta connects directly to the HD core card. Protools will see the Rosetta as though it's a 192 IO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:11 PM
tim carter tim carter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 318
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

That would take care of 8 dig chnls.. what about the additional chnls I need.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:38 PM
OddsAre OddsAre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,027
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

Tim you are opening a can of worms if you wanna move to HD just for 16 inputs. While O.G. and Brad have good advice if you went that route, maybe you should first look to see if you could get a streamlined LE machine running. I run LE all day every day and record and mix full time. For me I don't see it necessary to head into HD land until I am really ready to incorporate heavy external hardware processing. The can of worms I was eluding to above starts like this... you get an HD1 card, it only comes with a few plugins and is really not a TON of processing power, nothing a Mac Pro can't handle. So now you start looking and TDM plugins are quite a bit more expensive. Like you said you need to buy another 8ch worth of interface, PLUS the X-HD cards which is another $1000 for 2. By the time you are done, you could have really put together a nice machine to run LE for a fraction of the price. What computer/PT version are you running right now? I can assure you that with a Mac Pro and setup properly you can get stable, error free performance, it just takes dedication to the system drive you are using to keep it clean and an OS and PT version that is proven stable. I'd be willing to help you put together a smokin' machine if you were wondering how I have mine setup. Sure it sucks that I am still on OSX 10.4.9 but my system is as stable as it has ever been, other than 7.1.1 on OSX 10.4.8. That might have been the best combo yet for stability for me.

I sometimes have the HD epiphanies and then sit down and do the math, and even already having the Mac Pro to put the cards into, the investment is substantial, plugins are the scary part.
__________________
Mac Book Pro Retina 2.6 GHz i7 Quad | 16GB | OSX 10.8.5 | Digi 002 | Apogee Rosetta 800/96 | PT 10 | Waves Gold/RevMaxx V9
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:58 PM
tim carter tim carter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 318
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

well.. this is good advice.. right now I'm running a g4, 10.4.9, 1024 GHz, 2GB, PT 7.4, 002R, C24 with the Rosetta 800... maybe my $ would be better spent on a Mac Pro?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-18-2008, 03:59 PM
RussUK RussUK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,725
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

Tim - I write on LE but complete tracks on HD, they are completely different animals, mostly because of the quality of the sound produced on a HD system. Don't be confused by the track count argument, whilst LE is perfectly acceptable for home studio/semi pro work, HD is a different world sound wise. It might help. if you've not heard to go and track and mix in a HD studio and hear the difference - yes you don't get the obviouse host based issues, but you get wole lot more sonically with a HD system. You should do they are also world's apart in cost.
__________________
I work with amazing people who do incredible things.

Founder of the Expert Sites.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-18-2008, 04:03 PM
tim carter tim carter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 318
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

Thanks Russ... this is a big part of my living and I work with some major artists here in Nashville... you're right, the quality is better... what would be your suggestion on what I should get? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2008, 04:16 PM
OddsAre OddsAre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,027
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

while I would agree with you Russ if you are talking about tracking through the digi002's analog inputs and letting the 002's converters do the work, then yes there is a huge difference between LE and HD sonically. However, tracking through the Rosetta straight into the ADAT I/O essentially beefs up the input to HD quality. Whether or not the 192 sounds better than Apogee conversion is a debate for another thread. I've even heard that the 192 uses converters designed by Apogee, maybe that's right maybe it's not. If you are talking about how the audio is handled internally once it has been converted than maybe we are in an area that I know less about. But for straight up conversion Apogee right in through the ADAT inputs is far from Semi-Pro quality. Presonus is Semi-Pro quality in my book. And to say it's a "different world" makes it sound like the difference between 8 bit and 24 bit. Would you say that you might have over stated that a bit? Or do you stick with that statement, I'm only curious. I will say that with LE you only get 8 inputs of pristine input, and 8 inputs of 002/003's average conversion, but I only use the Digi inputs when doing drums and even then usually only need to dip into 3 or 4 of them and save those for toms. After drums I use the Apogees 100% of the time, and yes there is a massive difference.
__________________
Mac Book Pro Retina 2.6 GHz i7 Quad | 16GB | OSX 10.8.5 | Digi 002 | Apogee Rosetta 800/96 | PT 10 | Waves Gold/RevMaxx V9
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2008, 06:50 PM
O.G. Killa's Avatar
O.G. Killa O.G. Killa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,152
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim carter View Post
That would take care of 8 dig chnls.. what about the additional chnls I need.
The rosetta 800 has 16 inputs, 8 digital and 8 analog. If you are already using the 8 digital, you still have 8 analog inputs. If you are using the 8 analog inputs, then you can get an 8 channel A/D and go into the 8 digital ins on the rosetta to get your full 16.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:19 PM
OddsAre OddsAre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,027
Default Re: Thinking of upgrading to HD

still would need another high quality 8ch AD converter. In which you might as well buy an AD16 for a total of 24 input 8 output combined with the Rosetta.
__________________
Mac Book Pro Retina 2.6 GHz i7 Quad | 16GB | OSX 10.8.5 | Digi 002 | Apogee Rosetta 800/96 | PT 10 | Waves Gold/RevMaxx V9
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thinking of upgrading from protools 8.0.3 to 10 tony.tipton Windows 6 06-22-2012 06:55 PM
Am I Nuts For Thinking of NOT Upgrading?? Mr. Kelly 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 33 08-02-2010 07:40 PM
Am I Nuts For Thinking of NOT Upgrading?? Mr. Kelly 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 6 08-01-2010 05:02 AM
Thinking of upgrading to 8 Shanegrla 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 9 08-24-2009 03:01 PM
thinking of upgrading to TDM ...a few questions shynomi Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) 4 12-06-2004 07:51 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com