Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:15 PM
APAULOS APAULOS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 942
Default Two schools of thought on the 002

I was going to post this in another thread, but it was so bogged down with tangents that I didn't think it would be heard.

There are those who think the 002 is an ugly toy, and those who think it's a great move for Digidesign. At first I was leaning towards the "toy" group, but after kicking it with an avid Logic user last night, I realise that this could be the best move Digi's ever made. The "toy" group seems shocked at the big price tag, but I guess you have to look at the big picture... There are about 70,000 registered Logic users that are going to be completely unsupported in about two months, and this is in the same price for features category as a full blown Logic system.

My freind has always bagged on Digidesign for being so Mac, and up until about two weeks ago he was trying to get me to make the switch to Logic. Last night I saw him turn into a Digi fan right before my eyes...All I had to do was show him the 002 quicktime movie. He was especially impressed at how the 002 was so well integrated. Firewire interface, automated controller, and software all in one package. No more compatibillity issues.

I would like to discuss the pro's and con's of the 002 with some people who are willing to look at both sides of the coin. I really just want to get a better understanding of what the 002 can and can not do. For me the biggest 'con' of the 002 is the lack of softsynth support, but David Summich assured us that it was high on the Digi developers priority list, so I believe we will see that change very soon. My biggest 'Pro' would be the firewire interface. I do not like getting out a screwdriver and jacking with my CPU. I know some people get off on that, but I usually wind up screwing something up. I'm a musician not a computer technician.

Anyone else have some reasonable pro's and con's? I only ask that you keep your cool while posting to this thread, if you want to rant there are plenty of other threads that are full of people for you to fight with. Peace.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:22 PM
APAULOS APAULOS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 942
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Here's another HUGE 'pro' for me...I'm looking forward to getting my hands off of the mouse and keyboard, and back on some faders [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:28 PM
Swaphappy Swaphappy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

That was a cool movie and I was impressed.
But it scared me a little too.
All those fader knobs moving by themselves,
lights flickering, and button pushing.
My concern is that all that stuff will brake
down over time. I just prefer to stick with
software and a computer, I don't need a control
surface and I don't want anything I can't fix myself.
I can fix my computer and reload software but I can't fix that thing.

I would keep the firewire interface and higher sample rate but the rest should be a simple breakout box with say 16 anolog imputs and
outputs.

Excuse me if this sound negative I'm
really just undecided about the 002 right
now. It's different. Might take some getting
used to.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:50 PM
Mark_Knecht Mark_Knecht is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,500
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Hi guy,
For you I'll stop lurking for awhile. I think this is a very interesting topic.

Right now for me the only positive aspect of this thing is the faders. If the version of Pro Tools that comes with this is well integrated enough to pick up changes made there and get them into the automation sequences, then I could see how that would be interesting to some folks. It's not interesting enough to get me to spend that amount of money, but it is cool, I'll give you that.

OK, so what am I not liking about this thing? The faders, and the fact you only get eight of them. I guess I think if you're mixing 32 tracks, won't you always think 8 faders is a toy? Again, not really very important to me.

On the downside is the restrictive hardware again. I said to a couple of other people that this is really just an 001 on steroids. 18 channels + 96KHz. I'm paying for 4 preamps that I personally won't use very often, and I'm not very sure that I'd bother with 96KHz at home. The 002 still won't allow me to use all of my current GigaStudio setup where I can generate 18 audio signals without blinking.

So, if I'm going to pan it, I think that I have to give my sort of baseline competitive system for comments, good or bad, so here goes:

1) Cubase SX for $550
2) RME DigiFace + interface card for $700
3) Alesis AI-3 for $400

For about $1650 I get 26 inputs, more than 32 audio tracks, better MIDI integration and have about $700 or so left over for a good external preamp, or something else, based on what I need, not what someone tells me I should have.

And with the above hardware, I can spend about $550 and get a second DigiFace, or a MultiFace, and have 26 more inputs for a total of 52.

So, for me, so far, I see this new product as somewhat exciting, but not really very interesting.

I hope this was the sort of conversation you were looking for.

Take care,
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:53 PM
Captain_Pants Captain_Pants is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,993
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Apaulos.....if I may, I think you meant 002 in your first paragraph... Threw me a curve, but I hit it... [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
__________________
Ill suffer winter alone;
ten thousand miles from home...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2002, 02:01 PM
Mark_Knecht Mark_Knecht is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,500
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

BTW - On other BIG pro is that now there is a Pro Tools solution for laptop users. I can see how the Firewire part helps in that area a lot.

That does exist also for the RME solution I outlined above.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2002, 02:26 PM
APAULOS APAULOS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 942
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Quote:
Posted by Captain Pants
Apaulos.....if I may, I think you meant 002 in your first paragraph... Threw me a curve, but I hit it...
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Oops, check it again.
Quote:
Posted by Swaphappy;
Excuse me if this sound negative I'm
really just undecided about the 002 right
now. It's different. Might take some getting
used to.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Hey Swap, I want the negative and the positive, and you bring up some good points.
Quote:
Posted by Mark Knecht;
I hope this was the sort of conversation you were looking for.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Yeah Mark, that's exactly what I was looking for. I was looking at almost the same set-up before the oo2 came out-RME Digiface, SX, and an RME AD-8. The other option was saving up a little and getting the Trak 2 with the firewire port and 8 channel expansion.
Quote:
Posted by Mark;
OK, so what am I not liking about this thing? The faders, and the fact you only get eight of them. I guess I think if you're mixing 32 tracks, won't you always think 8 faders is a toy? Again, not really very important to me.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">True, when I saw that there was only 8 faders I was kinda bummed, then I remembered that I couldn't afford 32 automated faders anyway and I cheered right up [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] Seems like the nudge function will help a lot though. I wonder if there will be some sort of expansion pack for the 002? I like the way that Logic control left you with options, but the 002 doesn't look like it would connect to another unit. It isn't really shaped right for that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2002, 02:32 PM
APAULOS APAULOS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 942
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Quote:
I would keep the firewire interface and higher sample rate but the rest should be a simple breakout box with say 16 anolog imputs and
outputs.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Also a good point! If they came out with a rackmount version for about $1500 I bet that a lot of people would hop on that! I would still probably spring for the Flashing lights, faders and pan pots though. It did seem a bit weird that there are the same amount of ins as the 001. That might have been a bad call on the part of digi.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-18-2002, 03:04 PM
Dreamware Dreamware is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 484
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

Also notice in the quicktime video what OS they were doing the 002 demo on...Windows XP baby!
__________________
Alex

www.dreamware.ca
Have something to brag about...Own a Dreamware Audio PC...

My Rig:

AMD Athlon XP 1700+
512MB PC2700C2 Corsair
MSI KT3ULTRA ARU
2x 80GB Seagate Barracuda 4 in RAID 0
GeForce 2 Ti 64MB
Lite-On 40x12x40 CD-RW
16x Pioneer DVD
Intel Pro/100 +
SB Audigy
Digi 001
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-18-2002, 03:13 PM
gabriel_p gabriel_p is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 792
Default Re: Two schools of thought on the 002

I only need 96Khz, 2 Good Pres and Better Converters, that's IT. I can solve the last 2 with outboard gear, but the first one, well...that's a little more complicated
__________________
Take Care,
Gabriel.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
online schools? Xone General Discussion 0 05-16-2007 05:27 AM
Has anyone taken a Pro Schools course? fourthtunz Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 3 10-06-2003 06:46 PM
MBox in Schools homershines 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 03-19-2003 04:33 PM
OH schools of thought, what's yours? DBX165 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 45 04-03-2002 09:04 AM
?ProTools Schools LarsRec Tips & Tricks 0 03-08-2001 08:45 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com