|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
I can now track and mix @ 32 sample buffer size with my HD Native card and 16x16 Digital interface with no errors.
I achieved this by turning Intel turbo boost off in the motherboard bios and setting CPU to the highest fixed speed (not over clocked). also I find my RTAS usage is lower. For example in one project the RTAS meter went from 32% down to 8%. Previously a 64 sample buffer was as low as I could achieve. Very stable now with 32 samples. Even with this low sample size I can track and mix some pretty nice size projects. Currently working on a project with 24 tracks (wave files) 8 native-instruments soft synth's about 32 Waves plugins 1 convulsion reverb on aux 1 and a delay plug on aux 2. Wow! I just wanted to share the breakthrough. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Very nice. Try it at 64 and 128 and see how much)or little) the latency feels. I have heard that recording at 128 on HD/Native is very acceptable for most musicians
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Quote:
If not for this method, coming in dry even 128 would be hard to notice. It is nice now to be able to track @ 32. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Why would you track with a compressor plugin? Outboard comprsessor - yes, for sure.
Greg
__________________
Intel i7 3930K, Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (rev 1.0), 32 GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 ram, EVGA Nvidea GT 720 TI video card, a Samsung 850 Pro (256 GB) OS drive, 2 Samsung 850 Pro's (512 GB) in externally mounted drive bays for session and sample storage, Win 10 Pro, PT Ultimate (Native)2019.10, HD Omni, HD I/O 16x16 . |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Quote:
b) No need to commit to the sound. You can track through the compressor without having to settle for the level of compression.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Quote:
It all depends on what I'm trying to accomplish. Both work great. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Generally, I use a compressor (outboard) after the mic pre, but before the converters only to catch potential overs. Obviously, this is very mild compresssion. Once I have the vocal recorded at the proper level, then I put on a plug-in and compress to taste.
I also set up a heaphone mix so the singer doesn't have any trouble hearing themself. If I have a singer that wanders toward the mic, I pull the pop screen forward and I put a piece of gaffers tape on the floor and tell them to keep their toes on the tape. To each his own. Greg
__________________
Intel i7 3930K, Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (rev 1.0), 32 GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 ram, EVGA Nvidea GT 720 TI video card, a Samsung 850 Pro (256 GB) OS drive, 2 Samsung 850 Pro's (512 GB) in externally mounted drive bays for session and sample storage, Win 10 Pro, PT Ultimate (Native)2019.10, HD Omni, HD I/O 16x16 . |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Nothing wrong with tracking thru a plugin compressor, but check the latency on the Waves comp. If its higher than zero(I bet it is), then try using BF76. It will do the same job, but with 0-1 sample of latency(you can always swap it out later if you just gotta have the Waves comp). Personally, I usually track thru an ART Pro VLA II with NOS Mullard tubes. It sounds great and you really don't hear too much until you really have too much(like 8db of GR). I find at 3-4db of GR, its fine(use it when recording acoustic guitars too). Bass goes thru the ART or a DI from Aphex called the Punch Factory(built-in opto compressor that is surprising). As for singers hearing well, I find that pushing the fader to +6 to +9 makes them all happy
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tracking and Mixing @ 32 sample Buffer
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
tracking in Mpowered -> mixing in LE | tonejunkee | Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) | 1 | 01-26-2008 03:36 PM |
tracking in M Powered -> Mixing in LE | tonejunkee | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 01-26-2008 01:15 PM |
Hardware Buffer: Mixing vs. Tracking | paul Neathery | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 06-27-2007 11:55 AM |
Tracking in TDM and Mixing in LE. Need a good HD. | Droog | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 03-30-2005 02:28 PM |
tracking-mixing thread | arcarsenal | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 06-15-2003 01:14 PM |