|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bring back the Lexiverb!
Sorry Digi, Lexiverb smokes the ReverbOne.
I miss it now that I've gone HD. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bring back the Lexiverb!
I completly agree with you; it's really a great loss when you go HD , no other reverb plug-in replace it
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bring back the Lexiverb!
Definately.
It's the only complaint clients have when using our studio's HD rig. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bring back the Lexiverb!
Where is the problem Digi? License problems? Above 48 kHz? [img]images/icons/confused.gif[/img]
__________________
PT 12.4.0, iMac 27" Retina 4GHz i7, 32GB RAM, PoCo x8, Digi002 Fact., Logic X|FCPX|Motion Plugins: Waves Diam. V9|Artist Sign Ser.|SSL|GTR3.5, TC MD3|Harm4|VSS3|DVR2|Nonlin|Unwrap, Sonnox Infl|Dyn, Autotune VI: Reason 8, Ivory It., Trilian|Omnisphere, VG2/RealGuitar, Kontakt6|GPO, Goliath|Gypsy|Fab Four, Candy, Structure, EZdrum, BIAB Audiophile Hardware: TLM49|TLM103, SPL Track One, TC M-One, Artist Contr.v2|Transp|3xMix |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bring back the Lexiverb!
There several factors to take in account here :
There is more money to be made developing chips and the software that goes with it and selling it in expensive boxes. Why would Lexicon write plugins for DSP chips that are not optimal for reverb application, have clients run 5 reverbs when having bought one plugin, and on top of it get ripped off by people who... well you know, people who don't care to buy floppy drives. The real solution would be for Digidesign to team up with several companies (like Lexicon, TCworks, etc.) to put together some kind of LAN-TDM bus interface to interconnect hardware dynamically like the old lexicon (nubus?) hardware or the hard samplecell. The idea would be for that bus not to be computer hardware specific like PCI or nubus. Remember MIDI ? What a lesson to be learned. Once invented it needed the clout of companies like Yamaha to impose that standard, but everyone benefited from that, even though at first sight some companies like Roland had developed their own stuff, fearful of economic fallout from interconnecting units from different manufacturers... The key to all this is selling hardware. It is a sad fact that there is more money to be made from selling systems to studios who need plenty interfaces to mix on their Neve/ssl/etc., than to virtual 100% Protools configuration who can run a whole studio on 16 I/O That is why I fear that it is going to be difficult getting the Lexiverb back for those running HD or PT6... [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bring back the Lexiverb!
I also miss it... but this is common digi policy: why port Lexiverb to HD when they can sell ReverbOne?!
__________________
www.extensivemusic.com |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bring back the 99.99 | joesackic | Pro Tools 10 | 2 | 10-28-2011 01:18 AM |
need your help to bring back my 002.. | nadex | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 02-09-2005 02:49 PM |
WAY OT: Bring Back the Magic | valvebrother | General Discussion | 1 | 01-11-2005 11:03 AM |
Bring back RAM Disk?????? | Kenny Gioia | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 17 | 07-28-2003 11:33 AM |
Bring Back SoftSamplecell for OS X | roberts | General Discussion | 4 | 04-26-2003 09:18 PM |