|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
Can anyone tell me an answer to this for sure? I have heard a few different things.
Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
Quite significant difference. the 001's are
very thin comparatively. I have had much better results using my ADAT XT20 as converters which sound way better to me. maybe look into some external convertors for better results! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
I love the converters in the Presonus Digimax and it give an additional 8 inputs via lightpipe. Best investment I ever made.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
So, what I heard is hear say- that the 001 converters are the same as the 888/24?
Is anyone DEFINITE about this? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
Night and day difference between the two.
I've been tracking bands with the 001 for a year or so. Finally got a TDM rig to work with. We bouht an 888/24 and a 1622 to go with that system. The 888 definitely sounds better (than the 1622 and the 001.) Balanced XLR's v. TRS can't make that big of a difference. The 888 definitely has to have different converters without a doubt. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
Lucky has the answer go with the digimax, it's great for live stuff also...
__________________
Rudy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
I don't know the facts, but I do know that I hear a big difference between the 001 and the 882/20.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
Somehow I missed which has better converters: 001 or 882/20? I must be blind to the post that says it...
I think it was pretty clear that the 888/24 has WAY better converters than the 001. ------------------ LW
__________________
Larry PT 2021; MacBookPro M1; 16GB; Spectrasonics; Native Instruments, Toontrack, Waves...too many plugins. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
I think the comparison was with the 882/20.
Cheers, Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much worse are the 001 coverters than those on the 888/24?
When it first came out, I recall something being said about a digi engineer making the comparison. Something about the Digi001 converters comparing favourably to the 882/20. I think the text used to be on the old Digi001.com site. However, spec (S/N, dynamic range etc) and sound are very different beasts. I haven't used an 882 so can't comment on the latter.
The 888/24's have far superior converter specifications. Cheers, Mike [This message has been edited by MikeC (edited March 13, 2001).] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
worse and worse every day. LE Mbox truly BLOWS! | tomcat | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 10 | 11-18-2003 09:21 PM |
Best Apogee A/D D/A coverters for HD | remote | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 24 | 05-21-2003 02:16 PM |
Location of Digi001 Coverters: In breakout box or on card | Burton | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 11-02-2001 06:43 AM |
Best I/O coverters for my hard earned $$$ | thumpa | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 8 | 10-16-2001 09:21 AM |
WHAT IS WORSE?? | Tell | Tips & Tricks | 4 | 10-10-2001 04:49 PM |