![]() |
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Might be a question to ask Waves?
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. But they aren't responsible for 3rd parties coding for AAX.
I heard Waves is onboard with AAX 100%. The question of when is entirely up to them.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
W: Our pluginns will and do work with RTAS on AAX. Me: No DSP support? W: At this stage only CPU. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Of course it will take time to crank out AAX plugins, but it doesn't mean they aren't working on it. Just because we heard about them yesterday doesn't mean developers haven't known about them or been working on them for a while. According to Avid, they already have over 100 devs onboard with AAX, and 25 of which are showcasing AAX plugins right now at AES.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe they are just waiting to see how the whole HDX thing gets going. At one end Wave has been nice with getting TDM stuff out even knowing it's dead.. then again Waves have their own real-time systems thay are developing for example to other live-console manufacturers who can now also run plugins on their live systems, so there might be some issues between the two. Or they might not reached a good deal between themselves yet, as Avid is probably charging for AAX licenses and Waves might have a different vision how much they want to pay. We never know... But I'm not getting HDX until Waves has plugs for it and reasonable upgrade price for my Mercury TDM that's for sure.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Digidesigner,
That is an interesting thought. If they are charging so much for this upgrade, I can only wonder what they are going to charge other developers to be able to use AAX. If somebody like WAVES didn't jump onboard, it would definitely be a big issue.
__________________
recording.guru : FREE Pro Tools Tips and 19 Video Basic Training Course Pro Tools HDX 2022.12 Mac Pro 7,1 3.2 GHz 16-Core Xeon W 160 GB RAM macOS 11.6.0 Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro Tools 9 and Waves 8 Platinum | needmorehelp | Windows | 5 | 02-07-2011 10:53 AM |
Waves Platinum or Waves SSL. The better purchase? | vocalvoodoo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 02-13-2006 03:43 PM |
help with waves platinum | SublimeAndy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 12-17-2004 06:23 PM |
Waves Platinum | karusse | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 13 | 03-20-2003 07:19 AM |
WOW! Waves Platinum... | Captain_Pants | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 07-17-2002 09:10 PM |