|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
Test by spreading the 7 channels of opus to 1 instrument channel per track. Another easy test is Spitfire LABS which are free. In kontakt it is a work flow to build 16 instruments in one instance of kontakt then use midi tracks to work with it. Testing in kontakt a lot of folks have used separate instrument tracks per instrument. EW Play may do better broken out.
__________________
PT 2022.12 studio, Cubase 12 Pro, 12 Core Mac Pro 6,1 96GB OS X 12.6.6, Mac Mini i7 QC 16GB, Digico Soundgrid DLI, Revive Audio 96IO & 192 DBox & 2BussLT for summing, Waves, SoundToys and a pile of other plugins. NI Maschine/Komplete Ultimate 12 and many many, too many Kontakt Libraries. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmT..._as=subscriber Last edited by LoudBassTone; 06-24-2022 at 05:23 AM. Reason: can’t type |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
Yeah, I didn't think Melodyne was the primary suspect. I think it's Opus and of course Neutron.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
Interesting, I didn't suspect this.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
. I just figured since the M1 Ultra can process 22 trillion operations per second vs. my old Intel MacMini at 12,596M operations per second ProTools would be able to get things done faster hence less delay.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
I had two instances of Neutron 4, one of my vocal bus and the other on my keyboard bus which uses Opus (w/7 channels). I wanted to try out the new unmaking feature in Neutron 4. I've since gone back to my old stand-by, ProQ-3 which I really like and use all the time.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
I had two instances of Neutron 4, one of my vocal bus and the other on my keyboard bus which uses Opus (w/7 channels). I wanted to experiment with the new unmaking feature in Neutron 4 and the AI. I've since gone back to my old masking stand-by, ProQ-3 which I really like and use all the time.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
I had assumed you were doing limiting with aggressive look ahead, ProQ-3 is interesting in that it can also be a trap for players, a very nice but complex EQ with linear phase modes that can introduce quite significant latency.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
Great suggestion. It alleviated some of the problem. I now have 7-8 channels of virtual instruments with no issues anymore. Multiple instances of Opus with one channel on instrument tracks is the way to go.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I missing? I expected better.
As much as I like Neutron it had to go. It was contributing to the problem. It wasn’t all it’s fault; how I designed my signal flow was a contributor but removing it improved the situation.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BFD lite? does not act as expected | b mcgibney | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 11-24-2008 07:23 PM |
What can be expected at NAMM | mik | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 12-29-2006 04:20 PM |
When is PT's 7 expected? | TCDet | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 10-24-2005 02:05 PM |
Digi 003. When is it expected? | JasonGough | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 09-18-2005 11:44 AM |
1.6 GHz G5 expected in 2 months! | Slaterman | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 9 | 11-30-2001 05:02 PM |