Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2010, 12:26 PM
PTcomposer PTcomposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 59
Default Losing "track" of VI virtual inputs

I need to know if anyone else is experiencing this. Since I became a PT user back on 7.3, I've had issues using multi VIs. I would load a few instances of Konatkt and assign multiple virtual outputs and route them to either aux tracks or instrument tracks. So I might have 1 instance of Kontakt running several instruments out to dedicated virtual outputs, another instance doing the same thing for another set of instruments, an instiance of Stylus running with indivdual loops going out to individual outputs for FX processing, etc.

Generally, these templates would behave correctly, but then one day I'd open a session and suddenly Pro Tools had "lost track" of these VI outputs. Or I'd try to import session data to a new session, and all the outputs would be mis matched. Some outputs would simply not be selectable; PT would default to output 3/4 of Kontakt Module 2, and never let me assign that track again to receive output 3/4 of Kontakt Module 1.

It got to the point where I decided the only STABLE way of loading VI's in Pro Tools was to load SEPARATE instances of Kontakt or Stylus per output that I needed. Obviously this caused a huge amount of seemingly unnecessary CPU load due to a huge number of Kontakts loaded, but at least I knew I wouldn't wake up one day and have all of my routing screwed up.

Unfortunately, I made the mistake of going the multi output route again, this time using a combination of Kontakts, and VI Ens Pro Outputs. I'm starting to run into the problem again.

I'm not sure what to do. I can't deal with this kind of problem. I don't think many people run into it because not many people overload PT with these VIs the way I am. But its becoming a deal breaker. I don't want to cripple my system anymore by running excessive numbers of Kontakt Instances, and I sure as hell don't want to be prohibited from running VSL Ens Pro in the background either.

Any help or corroboration would be appreciated.
__________________
Greg Nicolett, Film and TV Composer
www.gregnicolett.com
------------------------------------------------
Pro Tools LE v8.03 Digi 002r w/ DV Toolkit 2 Mac Pro 2.26 gHZ 12 GB RAM Snow Leopard 10.6.3
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2010, 02:04 PM
mrbobb mrbobb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 140
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

Yes, I've see the same problem on my rig.

Sometimes the inputs will move on the same plugin, so RMX will change it's input randomly from channel 1 to channel 2. Other times, I'll come back to a session with multiple VI's and they will be all over the place. Stylus assigned to Boom, Omnisphere assigned to Mini Grand. Really tired of this bug.

PT 8.0.3 LE Digi 002
Dual Quad-Core Mac 2.8 (Early 09)
__________________
Producer/Songwriter/Mixer
www.matchstickmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2010, 02:08 PM
PTcomposer PTcomposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

Good, then I'm not crazy. I see this as a MAJOR bug, and I'm frankly amazed not more folks have mentioned it before. I can only imagine whats going on wrong under the hood to cause these kind of major routing errors.

Avid - can you look into this? What do you need from me? I can no longer afford to deal with this problem and will be forced to switch, finally, to another DAW to get over it unless I have some sense it may be resolved at some point in the near future.
__________________
Greg Nicolett, Film and TV Composer
www.gregnicolett.com
------------------------------------------------
Pro Tools LE v8.03 Digi 002r w/ DV Toolkit 2 Mac Pro 2.26 gHZ 12 GB RAM Snow Leopard 10.6.3
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2010, 09:01 AM
PTcomposer PTcomposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

No one else care to chime in on this?

I must say, this IS the end of my composing relationship with Pro Tools if I can't get this resolved. This error cropped up during the middle of a feature film, and it crippled my entire mixing/stem printing process. It's not a bug I can afford to risk running into again on professional projects.
__________________
Greg Nicolett, Film and TV Composer
www.gregnicolett.com
------------------------------------------------
Pro Tools LE v8.03 Digi 002r w/ DV Toolkit 2 Mac Pro 2.26 gHZ 12 GB RAM Snow Leopard 10.6.3
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2010, 09:42 AM
pgripp pgripp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

Yes, this happens to me all of the time. It is a problem. I'll open a session, and the midi output of an instrument track will have switched, either to a different VI or to "none".

I'll only have a couple of VIs per session, so it is easy to figure out. But I imagine it is a huge hassle for some people.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2010, 10:24 AM
PTcomposer PTcomposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

Quote:
I'll open a session, and the midi output of an instrument track will have switched, either to a different VI or to "none".
Hmm...is it just the midi outputs or the audio outputs? I have had my midi outputs switch occasionally, but it wasn't as big of a deal for me to fix as the VI audio outputs switching is. When my VI outputs get messed up, I can NO LONGER select them as the inputs to an aux or instrument track! Meaning, any instruments within Kontakt / Stylus I have routed to Kontakt Output 3/4 must be re-routed to another virtual output. Outputs 3/4 are dead forever for that instance of Kontakt. Pro Tools either says "the output is forced inactive" or simply connects me to Outputs 3/4 of another Kontakt Instance. Not good.

And yes, you can imagine what a hassle it is when one is working with 20-30 sessions worth of cues and having to deal with this bug 20-30 times over.

It's as if we need a VI routing matrix in the I/O settings page so that we can see how all of our virtual outputs are routed, and make corrections if necessary.
__________________
Greg Nicolett, Film and TV Composer
www.gregnicolett.com
------------------------------------------------
Pro Tools LE v8.03 Digi 002r w/ DV Toolkit 2 Mac Pro 2.26 gHZ 12 GB RAM Snow Leopard 10.6.3
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2010, 10:52 AM
pgripp pgripp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Default Re: Loosing "track" of VI virtual inputs

Oh, I should have read the post more thoroughly. I've only had the problem with the midi-outputs (which is irritating). However, although I use Kontakt, I generally never reassign the outputs so I can't really comment on that. That sounds like a nightmare.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-22-2010, 04:47 PM
PTcomposer PTcomposer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 59
Default Re: Losing "track" of VI virtual inputs

So - Avid - whats the best way about getting you to notice this? Or anyone? Can I still submit a bug report via the Avid website? I can't find the old form.
__________________
Greg Nicolett, Film and TV Composer
www.gregnicolett.com
------------------------------------------------
Pro Tools LE v8.03 Digi 002r w/ DV Toolkit 2 Mac Pro 2.26 gHZ 12 GB RAM Snow Leopard 10.6.3
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-15-2010, 01:38 PM
edlikethehorse edlikethehorse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9
Default Losing "track" of VI virtual inputs

I just learned about Vienna Ensemble Pro and it got me excited. I am very unhappy that PT 9 will not be 64-bit compatible. I am sick of having 6GB of extra memory I cannot address from PT. I bought my Mac Pro in 2006 and never would have guessed the PT software wouldn't be caught up by now, let alone the OS just becoming available. I have been a loyal PT user since 1998. I hate Logic...(yes, I've used it plenty... I don't like it). Now, I see this huge bug that again crushes my hopes and dreams of never printing a VI again. Avid, I just want to use my hardware. WILL YOU PLEASE FIX THIS? I want to spend $200 bucks and get the functionality I've been waiting 4 years for. I was prepared to spend whatever you asked for a 64-bit PT9, but alas, you let me down.... Don't do it again.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Virtual Track" auditioning? Jakay Pro Tools 10 2 01-09-2013 09:31 PM
Toggle Track view ("Opt"+"-") doesn't work LukeFromBerlin macOS 3 04-01-2012 04:43 AM
MC Mix losing "page" button functionality... JR Fountain Artist Series 1 09-28-2011 12:04 PM
If I "Remove Unused Regions" after "Consolidate", track won't play? el biciclista Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 10 04-02-2003 10:17 AM
"Track" as a synonym for "record" John Link General Discussion 2 08-19-2002 11:54 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com