Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools M-Powered (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2008, 11:07 AM
AbjectEvolution AbjectEvolution is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 78
Default Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Ok I have the most recent version of Pro Tools 7.4 (cs2 I think). I recently got Reason 4 and have been routing the two together. I have the music production toolkit as well, so my track count has increased. For the first time, I have gone over the normal ammount of tracks, and almost every track has 2-3 plugins added to it.

Today I was working on a new song, and I duplicated a track. I pressed play, and then recieved this error.

Disk cache is too small. Try increasing the Cache Size or DAE Playback Bugger Size in the Playback Engine dialog. (-9500)

I went to the playback engine thing and increased everything that I could, and when I pressed ok... I got this error

Pro Tools is unable to reacquire the hardware because it is in use by another application. Please quit other applications and hit "OK" to retry. If the hardware cannot be acquired, please quit and relaunch Pro Tools.

So I closed Reason and all the background IM programs and such, and then tried again, but got the same error.

I closed Pro Tools and restarted my computer, but it didn't fix the problem.

So what's wrong?

I have a Intel Core 2 Quad 2.40g
2g of ram
I have 3 harddrives. I have an 80g that is partitioned and then partition without windows is what Pro Tools is installed on. I save all my files and work from my other 300g hard drive.

Please help.

Thanks,
DM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2008, 11:53 AM
sinukus sinukus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 159
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Hmm, Not sure why duplicating the track would do this, but you can work around it by putting the track(s) into rendered mode. I'm assuming the track is elastic.
__________________
Below Zero Beats on 92.7 FM San Francisco
Sundays 8pm - Midnight
http://belowzerobeats.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2008, 02:33 PM
AbjectEvolution AbjectEvolution is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 78
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Yeah I think it is. How do I put it in rendered mode? That will fix the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-11-2008, 03:05 PM
AbjectEvolution AbjectEvolution is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 78
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Uh.. .crap. Now when I try to launch Pro Tools, it freezes at "DAE loaded".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:51 PM
AbjectEvolution AbjectEvolution is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 78
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Ugh... I restarted and now Pro Tools runs again, but I'm getting that same stupid error.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:55 PM
sinukus sinukus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 159
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

In the edit window where you select the elastic plug in, select rendered instead of real time.
__________________
Below Zero Beats on 92.7 FM San Francisco
Sundays 8pm - Midnight
http://belowzerobeats.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2008, 08:34 PM
AbjectEvolution AbjectEvolution is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 78
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

I fixed it. I set the... something... don't remember now... to 2 in the playback engine dialogue. Now it seems fine. Weird. Thanks for the info about elastic time though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2008, 10:42 PM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

OK I got this same thing happen yesterday. My second "9500" ever.

No playback because of the error.. unless I place the cursor somewhere where thereīs no audio at all.

The error came after I selected monophonic EA on a new bass track and let EA analyze it. I did the tweaks and consolidated the track... then "9500" jumped up. I tried cold boot that saved my butt last time I had "9500", not working now.

Even finally deleting the new track didnīt help. The session opens but wonīt play... so I tried importing it to a fresh session, same thing. I then copied the lot ( "save copy in..." ) to another drive, same results.

I was thinking of reverting to a saved system image from last week but I wanted to dig in a little deeper on this. My system has been extremely stable,solid and fast for a couple of years by the way.

Then I found out - in horror - that NONE of these yesterdayīs sessions worked anymore... I had a buch of different saved versions of the session... they all gave me "9500" , autobackups too. So I didnīt only lose the new bass, I lost it all.

Or so I thought.

I got even more worried and tried some other sessions... a working session from the day before gave me "9500" as well. Got more worried, it looked like PTLE went permanently crazy with me using EA. I donīt use EA that much really. Probably never on a whole four minute track like this.

I finally noticed a mistake, sort of: I had two stereo gtr tracks with EA on ... they were just forgotten settings from another session that I had imported. So when I disabled EA from those tracks my session started to work normally. I opened a bottle of red wine for that relief, ten hours of work, a pretty good tune - and not a single bounce, nothing spared for a possible disaster.

I then tried EA again on a track. It turned out that no matter where I enabled EA, I got the "9500" right away now. So, all those sessions that donīt work now , they have EA enabled somewhere.

I think my next move is the obvious database/ pref trashing. I have NEVER done that to be honest, no problems until now. I have used PTLE for about five years on various computers, pretty much glitch free and pretty much every day. Iīll post the "trashing-results" later, right now my 7.4 cs2 wonīt work with any EA at all.

To make this post even longer: It would be nice to have a "master EA-toggle" somewhere in PTLE, wouldnīt it? Maybe itīs just me but I find it quite easy to forget EA on for a track, itīs not very easy to see. Like in this case where I imported a big, pretty template from another session. I had no idea that there already was EA on on a couple of tracks... and it worked for the whole day until I used EA again.

OK, now Iīm off for trashing.


EDIT: Oops, I should have posted this in PTLE forum I guess.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2008, 11:01 AM
Petander Petander is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 297
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Well I was too busy to do any testing today.

Everything worked fine after trashing the databases / prefs -stuff - but I didnīt have any time to try the Elastic thingy. I had to work, it was a 13 hour day and I got a tune finished ok.

But I gotta tell you:

One more "Elastic time" issue and Iīm back to 7.1 or 7.3. I do not want Elastic Time as a forced "update" that chokes my system. I record real instruments in real time. No need to tweak, itīs better to play it again if in doubt.

7.1 or 7.3 also run a bit more efficient on my rig, I occasionally revert back to those versions for really big sessions anyway.

Elstic bypass master switch, anyone?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------

- i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow .
- PTLE8 on a macbook.

- And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24


I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com
My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2008, 01:13 PM
sinukus sinukus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 159
Default Re: Disk Cache is too small? Problems!

Hold down the Alt key and select None on any EA track. Thats your master toggle right there.

In the Processing Prefs disable "Enable Elastic on New Tracks" and it wont enable it by default.
__________________
Below Zero Beats on 92.7 FM San Francisco
Sundays 8pm - Midnight
http://belowzerobeats.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could not allocate memory for the disk cache. Try lowering your disk buffer.. slim_shady Pro Tools 10 15 05-09-2017 05:20 PM
PT10's Disk Cache or RAM Disk. Why not use the same concept for VI memory space? sunburst79 General Discussion 6 09-15-2011 11:28 AM
Disk cache to small ?? rockme Pro Tools 9 3 11-18-2010 08:38 AM
Too small cache JimmyAdkins 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 01-29-2008 01:57 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com