|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
I have an 002. I have percussion going in the lightpipe and Bass going in analog.
Sounds fine going down, but when I playback, the perc track is always about 33ms. behind. In fact, all the Optical tracks are late. Anyone else notice this? All the sounds are coming from one machine. Any help??? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
i would like the final word on this too. should we be nudging the tracks that come in on the digital ports?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
i am going to do a test tonight.
snare drum hit in to my octopre connected to the adat in of my 002r. analog out of the octopre connected to analog 8 of the 002r. same hit recorded on two different tracks. one via digital in, one via analog in. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
ok, did the test a little while ago.
snare -> sm57 -> focusrite octopre -> 002r adat in 7/analog in 7 simultaneously. the adat input is consistantly 4 samples later than the analog in on both 48k and 44.1k. did the same test for spdif snare -> sm57 -> art DMPA -> SPDIF in L/analog in 7 simultaneously. the SPDIF input is consistantly 2 samples later than analog in at both 48k and 44.1k. hmmm |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
What you're seeing is normal - The 002 can compensate for it's own A/D conversion process, but can't for external A/D convertors, since it doesn't know how many samples it takes for the external convertor to complete it's A/D conversion.
Larold - which convertor are you using? 33ms seems like an excessively long A/D conversion time.... The 2-4 samples that therecordinghouse is getting is much more in line with typical conversion times. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
Digi support person - why not pass the word up that it would be good to allow the user to measure and configure the conversion delay for third party connected devices, so that this would work correctly?
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
2-4 samples is nothing... in no way, shape, or form is 2-4 samples going to effect the sound
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Latency: Optical in vs. Analog in
2-4 samples isn't a problem, but I don't think you'll find many interfaces with 2-4 sample conversion delays. If I recall correctly, just using a loopback cable on the Digi 002 S/PDIF introduced an error of dozens of samples (compared to tracks done on the internal converters), and that's obviously not counting any conversion delays.
In short, this is a delay which you'd really want to compensate for, if there's any correlation in the signal on the S/PDIF and the internal converters.
__________________
Quad 2.5 G5, 4.5G RAM |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
adat optical i/o - analog converters | aikon | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 25 | 03-05-2004 12:04 PM |
optical and analog support | tdyoder | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 02-20-2004 04:00 PM |
eq standard for 25mm analog SR optical | anders | Post - Surround - Video | 0 | 01-30-2003 11:58 AM |
analog & optical inputs together | tracks | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 01-17-2001 06:47 AM |
Is there an Analog adapter for the Optical ports? | Moot | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 09-06-2000 05:25 PM |