Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > macOS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-05-2023, 05:55 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,853
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDS View Post
And not to mention the circa ~2006 memory pricing. Memory costs $0.0015 a megabyte today, yet Apple want almost 10 times that.
Unfair comparison. ARM takes more performance from less memory, compared to x86.

Memory bandwidth of 800GB/sec is something. Intel Mac Pro had half of that which means ARM Mac Pro can do twice the work with its memory. Add faster SSD and we are at 3X performance easily.

Just for comparison, I have 2TB SSD for nightly backups. The idea of ARM processor handling that two terabytes in two and a half seconds is mindblowing.

No need for terabyte memory for now.

EDIT:
... and by the way, the 2019 towers also maxed out at 192GB memory if you bought the normal priced sticks. You needed the more expensive LR-DIMMs for more than 192GB and if you maxxed at 1.5TB your bank manager was happy. For a cheap price of 53 thousand dollars you bought yourself bragging rights that are already obsolete. And that is without display and other peripherals. Must have been most overpriced Mac ever!
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-05-2023, 06:01 PM
Carl Lie Carl Lie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,310
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Unfair comparison. ARM takes more performance from less memory, compared to x86.

Memory bandwidth of 800GB/sec is something. Intel Mac Pro had half of that which means ARM Mac Pro can do twice the work with its memory. Add faster SSD and we are at 3X performance easily.

Just for comparison, I have 2TB SSD for nightly backups. The idea of ARM processor handling that two terabytes in two and a half seconds is mindblowing.

No need for terabyte memory for now.
Well Janne- let us know when you pick your Mac Pro up since you seem to think it's a bargain.

C
__________________
PT 2021.10 HDX 16x24 -Mac Pro 12 Cores 48 GB RAM OS 10.13.6 - API 16 channel - AMS Neve 16 channel, AMS-Neve-SSL -Pres/Processing, Bock Audio, BLUE Bottle, Neumann, Josephson -Mics, Bogner, Kemper- Guitar, Chandler Zener-Curve Bender Outboard/Master. UAudio, Waves, Plugin Alliance etc.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2023, 06:08 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,853
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Lie View Post
Well Janne- let us know when you pick your Mac Pro up since you seem to think it's a bargain.
I have no such money but if our fellow mod Chris updates his pair of 2019 towers next year there is a chance I am invited to set them up.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2023, 07:15 PM
LDS LDS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,495
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Unfair comparison. ARM takes more performance from less memory, compared to x86.

Memory bandwidth of 800GB/sec is something. Intel Mac Pro had half of that which means ARM Mac Pro can do twice the work with its memory. Add faster SSD and we are at 3X performance easily.

Just for comparison, I have 2TB SSD for nightly backups. The idea of ARM processor handling that two terabytes in two and a half seconds is mindblowing.

No need for terabyte memory for now.

EDIT:
... and by the way, the 2019 towers also maxed out at 192GB memory if you bought the normal priced sticks. You needed the more expensive LR-DIMMs for more than 192GB and if you maxxed at 1.5TB your bank manager was happy. For a cheap price of 53 thousand dollars you bought yourself bragging rights that are already obsolete. And that is without display and other peripherals. Must have been most overpriced Mac ever!

You've swallowed the cool aid, Janne.

Apple use exactly the same Samsung LPDDR memory in their SoCs as everyone else in the industry. That includes pretty well every smart phone design in existence. Their enterprise grade ECC memory was overpriced. The price they want for smartphone memory is... just absurd.

The 800gb/s figure you are quoting merely represents total memory bandwidth. The M2 Ultra has twice the bandwidth of the M2 Max because it is two M2 Max chips on a single die. It needs to be high bandwidth because it does twice as much. That is what unified memory is. It gets shared by all the CPU and GPU cores, and without adequate bandwidth it will bottleneck.

Intel systems don't require memory to be shared. It has discrete DDR for RAM and GDDR graphics processes. To put it into perspective, an Nvidia A5000 has 786gb/s of memory bandwidth just for graphics processes alone...

192GB of memory for a 2019 Mac Pro will only cost $661 for the full 192GB. Not $1600 for just the 64 to 192gig upgrade.

And not to burst your bubble, but the read and write speeds of SSDs included in Apple Silicon machines is no different to current PCs. Have a read here, then compare it to the same test using a $299 4TB WD SN850x that I ran...

Apple's SoC design simply does not flatten, outperform or annihilate the competition. The benefit of unified memory is reduced CPU & GPU overhead. Lower overhead = lower power consumption. Performance per watt is where Apple Silicon excels.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Disk Speed Test 20230208.jpg (53.7 KB, 0 views)
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command.

Last edited by LDS; 06-05-2023 at 07:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-05-2023, 08:09 PM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,510
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
ARM takes more performance from less memory, compared to x86.
Oh bulltwinkles.

None the less the just announced Mac Pro is still an appealing machine for many users especially audio and avoiding stupid Thunderbolt expansion chassis. The sting might be when Apple and TSMC actually get production issues behind them and deliver M3 silicon with an expected significant performance kick. I've not had time to see if Apple committed or hinted any future CPU upgradeability/motherboard swaps with the new Mac Pro.

It's just not a high-end workstation in say Threadripper Pro workstation territory, way less cores, way less memory etc. No CUDA compatible GPUs (well no surprise there)..., and there is a Zen 4 Threadripper Pro maybe coming late this year. But thats all likely a side effect of TSMC delivery woes and problem with a very high-end processor packaging. What Apple has done for now is finally plugged an embarrassing hole in its product line up, good they have done that but I hope they do much better.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-05-2023, 08:33 PM
Eric Lambert's Avatar
Eric Lambert Eric Lambert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,580
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

This new ilk of Mac Pros, whatever we're calling them these days, has felt foreign its entire life. It has the Apple logo but it's uncharacteristically Apple, and perhaps even more so today.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-06-2023, 02:37 AM
uptheoctave uptheoctave is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 719
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Lie View Post
It's a $3,000 PCI expansion chassis!
Expansion chassis come with a few downsides.

You get much slower data transfer over TB than you do over PCIE.
My Mac Studio with a Sonnet chassis tops out around 2700MB/s over TB.
The 2019 Mac Pro will do double that.

Plus noise.
The great thing about the 2019 Mac Pro is how silent it is.
A Mac Studio with an expansion chassis is louder.
Too loud for my control room, which is why it is in the machine room.

I have no immediate need for the 2023 Mac Pro, nor the new Studio.
But if I was upgrading right now I'd get the Pro.

There are going to be some customers for whom the 192GB RAM limit is going to be a deal breaker.
I'm not one of those, mind.
__________________
James Richmond
https://www.jamesrichmond.com

2019 Mac Pro, 2022 Mac Studio Ultra
Avid S6, HDX2, MTRX II, MTRX, DAD AX64, AX32, Focusrite Rednet PCIER, Trinnov MC8 Pro.
Studio: https://www.voltperoctave.com | Music: https://www.euclideancircuits.com
Latest Article: Auto-Bounce for Logic Pro

Affiliate Links:
Auto-Bounce by Tom Salta
Dreamhost Web Hosting
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-06-2023, 03:15 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,853
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
It's just not a high-end workstation in say Threadripper Pro workstation territory, way less cores, way less memory etc.
Well, yes. On my dayjob I have 5THz worth of CPU, 10TB memory and 100TB storage available. You guessed it, my bread and butter comes from selling my Oracle DBA skills. That new ARM tower is still impressive for what it is.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2023, 03:17 AM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,510
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by uptheoctave View Post
Expansion chassis come with a few downsides.

You get much slower data transfer over TB than you do over PCIE.
My Mac Studio with a Sonnet chassis tops out around 2700MB/s over TB.
The 2019 Mac Pro will do double that.
Double? It does boat loads more than double PCIe bandwidth. A Thunderbolt 3/4 expansion chassis has 4 x PCIe 3 land of bandwidth.

If early reports that the new Mac Pro has 6 open slots at 2 x 16 PCIe 4 lane slots and 4 x 8 PCIe 4 lanes are correct then that a M2 Mac Pro has 2 * (( 2 * 16) + (4 * 8)) / 4 = 32 times the internal PCIe IO bandwidth of a Thunderbolt 3/4 chasssus (irregardless of how many slots it has).

Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 06-06-2023 at 10:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-06-2023, 06:34 AM
RobertDorn RobertDorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 405
Default Re: New Mac Studios AND an AS Mac Pro!

Quote:
Originally Posted by uptheoctave View Post
Expansion chassis come with a few downsides.

You get much slower data transfer over TB than you do over PCIE.
My Mac Studio with a Sonnet chassis tops out around 2700MB/s over TB.
The 2019 Mac Pro will do double that.

Plus noise.
The great thing about the 2019 Mac Pro is how silent it is.
A Mac Studio with an expansion chassis is louder.
Too loud for my control room, which is why it is in the machine room.

I have no immediate need for the 2023 Mac Pro, nor the new Studio.
But if I was upgrading right now I'd get the Pro.

There are going to be some customers for whom the 192GB RAM limit is going to be a deal breaker.
I'm not one of those, mind.
The sonnet/avid branded chassis noise is very annoying indeed, I also have it put away from my control room because otherwise the noise of the chassis won’t let me record anything with a mic in the control room.

As for the bandwidth, sure it’ll be much greater when having it on a pci slot in the Mac Pro instead of over Thunderbolt3, but in real world practice I guess we never ever get to use the max bandwidth available with TB , left alone that we need a PCI 16x gen4 slot bandwidth .
__________________
Apple MacBook Pro M2 Max, 96GB ram | Pro Tools HDX | Avid MTRX | Pro Tools Ultimate 2023.12 | macOS 13.6.3
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top Studios Use HDX/HDN/TDM? Barry Johns Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) 23 04-02-2015 06:58 PM
Let's see your Studios! ! ! Table Syrup Records ICON & C|24 0 03-03-2008 01:25 PM
LA studios erthquake General Discussion 2 10-30-2007 02:14 PM
using pro studios badperson 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 02-16-2002 03:02 PM
Thanks to all the studios from RO bigtree General Discussion 1 09-30-2000 07:22 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com