![]() |
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before you go out spending big $$$ on AT Hybrid please wait for others to post their experience, I can only assume that there might be problems with specific systems and that being the reason Antares will not officially support it..
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
So it is working for you on your Apple silicon machine without having to open it in Rosetta as you say. Again quite confused, is this an Apple silicon installer / build then? Otherwise how would it work? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is absolutely no documentation of AutotuneHybrid being Apple Silicon compatible on their website! I let my subscription lapse since I hardly used it but I guess we could download the demo and see how it reacts on an Apple M1/2/3/4.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on. guys, it is definately Arm-coded, i own it as i told before, and does a good job.
W. Helbsing |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And if it is Apple silicon ready, why are Antares saying it is not? I am not trying to be obtuse I am simply trying to work out what is going on. If I had an Apple silicon machine here I could download the demo and try it but I don't. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Because folks are likely confusing AutoTune and Auto Tune Hybrid. Occams razor and all... Anybody who thinks they have AutoTune *Hybrid* running natively on Apple Silicon support can you please post a screenshot of a PT Prefs2 plugin report showing the plugin version and all the other info shown there about the plugin. I expect it will say x86/Intel support but be careful here, even if that says "universal" it may not really be universal, if it does I'll pick apart the plugin bundle and see what is really happening. Quote:
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a screenshot from my Carbon based system. It also works on HDX..
https://imgur.com/a/zpjtSFm Edit: how do people post images here and what's everyone using to host the files? the IMG tag did not work with imgur.. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Thank you for taking the time! |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Carbon at 48kHz with AutoTune Hybrid is 2.38ms RTL (76 samples latency on AT Hybrid). |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Do you perhaps have the figures for 96kHz? Also, when you say depending on which Apollo, are you referencing duo vs quad, gen 1 vs 2, desktop vs rack, or other? Thanks |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carbon vs Apollo | noah330 | Pro Tools | 35 | 10-04-2023 02:36 PM |
Carbon Ultimate/Autotune Promo | SoundEng1 | Pro Tools | Carbon | 84 | 09-02-2021 09:00 AM |
Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before? | Oblivion777 | Pro Tools | Carbon | 72 | 04-03-2021 04:51 PM |
Strange Apollo Latency | orangepopsongs01 | Pro Tools 2018 | 11 | 06-07-2018 02:14 PM |
latency with new setup ua apollo | drewblue | macOS | 12 | 06-10-2013 06:20 PM |