View Single Post
  #8  
Old 06-30-2010, 03:54 PM
waltz mastering's Avatar
waltz mastering waltz mastering is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Posts: 144
Default Re: 44.1 kHz vs. 48 kHz - why not use the higher?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kelly View Post
Does the truncation yield a point of diminishing return, i.e., not produce enough of an improvement to offset the detriments of the truncation?
I assume you sample rate convert, but instead of truncating why don't you dither when reducing word length?

Izotope has a very good src algorithm as well as dither program.
__________________

Tom W

www.waltzmastering.com
Reply With Quote