View Single Post
  #7  
Old 11-24-2011, 03:45 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyDazzler View Post
No direct monitoring with the Omni.
LLM on the nativeHD, and 32 and 64 buffer are excellent as far a latency goes.
Hmm. I find it very strange that is says it has direct monitoring in the manual and you say it doesnt.

Quote:
The Mixer page of the Hardware Setup dialog lets you configure HD OMNI to mix the signals coming from HD OMNI physical inputs to the current active Monitor paths (direct monitor- ing). This way you monitor any incoming signal whether or not it is routed through the Pro Tools mixer.
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote