View Single Post
  #7  
Old 12-19-2001, 05:08 AM
Jules Jules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,565
Default Re: setting levels "naturally" vs. what "the books" say

I had my best quality mix for a while by using that 'straight line' tracking method. Reading the DUG reminded me of it again.. and I thought I would try it out again (I used to do it on 2" tape sessions)

I put all the mix faders at -10 the master at 0 and set a nice 'not overloading bass drum' level, then I set the input level of every other drum mic and instrument to sound roughly mixed sitting also at -10.

and so on..

Not to get TOO in love with the idea Dr J (!) - I have to tell you that, come mixdown time, the faders were all over the place - none level, EQ's added busses made etc - no way was it 'flat all the way' . But STARTING like this and using the Sony EQ plug in on everything - DID make for one of my best sounding productions on PT ever.

[img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

P.S. I always have a Cranesong Hedd accross my master fader on AES insert, this phattens up a mix nicely and I now can't live without it on a PT mix.
__________________
Jules
London, UK
Come hang with us here!
www.gearslutz.com
Reply With Quote