Quote:
Originally Posted by P,B,S
Reason for considering HDN is.
64bit give twice the processing now.
Thats a 100% increase in plugins (more or less)
With dynamically allocated plugins that is probably doubled again.
So thats , lets say , 200% increase in plugin performance per system.
The system was already 100% so with 200% plugin increase now its 300%.
Use a synced system and now that would be 600% power 6 times more.
Since i dont need all those plugins.
I can up the sample rate from 96k to 192k
there by increasing the sample resolution 100%
half as many tracks per computer at an increased sample rate should be exactly the same processing as it is in 32 bit.
That should leave approximately 250% extra per computer allowing 192k sample rates to finally be feasible both in track count and in plugin performance and resources. Not to mention V,Is
Let alone not having to drive the cpu to the brink of its abilities and hoping it will be able to handle it.
Of coarse those numbers are not fact, but its most likely not that far off
BUT IM SURE YOU KNEW THAT
as your the expert in credibility
|
Huh??!?! What???? Ummm no. I won't bat down everything, but 64-bit has nothing to do with, and I'm paraphrasing, "twice as much power more or less." Pro Tools 11 can access all the ram in your system instead of the previous 4GB limit. And the new AAE is more efficient than the old DAE. But twice as much power? Not even close.