Quote:
Originally Posted by O.G. Killa
But... plugins and any other digital processing you use on your audio WILL sound better at a higher sampling rate. But it usually requires twice the processing power... so that is the trade off.
|
I agree! The question remains if 88.2kHz would be your choice if your final product will be CD (44.1kHz), just because of the easy re-conversion (dividing by 2, rather than 2.1768... if you use 96 kHz)
I can clearly hear the difference between 44.1 and 88.2, but I can't hear any difference between 88.2 and 96.
Also, I believe that when tracking a big project, the summing of all your tracks might be better in 88.2 than 44.1.
These days, processing power or diskstorage should not be an issue, right?