View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-24-2011, 01:07 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shan View Post
Do you record through plug-ins?
No. I dont track with plugins. I always track dry.

I use direct monitoring on my Mbox Pro. Wich i belive means the mic input is directly routed to the output (headphone) without going through the computer and PT first.
To my ears this direct monitoring has much less audible latency than low latency monitoring has. Atleast on my mbox.
I guess it would be equal to plugin a mic into a mixer and monitor it on the mixer output (=no latency).

If you se my second post above it seems like also Omni has this feature (se page 34 in the manual). Just want to have someone else confirm this.

Infact I dont se the use of low latency monitoring if Omni has direct monitoring capabillities ?
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote