Thread: Possible bug
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 06-12-2021, 02:02 PM
Emi's Avatar
Emi Emi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Madrid. Spain
Posts: 619
Default Re: Possible bug

Quote:
Originally Posted by albee1952 View Post
Before we call this an "insert" bug, test again without the hardware insert as it may be unrelated to inserts. Have you gone into the IO setup>Insert Delay Compensation window and set a manual compensation amount? Hardware insert latency must be manually compensated for.
I tested without the hw insert and both aves are in sync. Once I insert the hw, the L channel only is off by a sample (Why?)

Yes I did all the procedure in the I/O setup. But even if I don't, why is the L channel off by a sample in comparison to the R channel if both channels were fed by a mono source.

Quote:
Originally Posted by albee1952 View Post
Next, where in the chain of events is the hardware insert? The screen shot looks like its on an AUX track(zooming in is useless as the resolution is too low for clarity). What happens if you simply bus to a new AUDIO track, record the sound and insert the hardware on the AUDIO track? What is the exact purpose of this(maybe there's a better way to achieve the same goal)?
It's on the oux track just to feed a mono source to a stereo track, but to test if the hardware insert is done right you have to use an aux track and insert the hw on the aux for this. It's not needed if the source track is stereo.

Anyway, my issue is, why aren't both L and R waves in sync if they were fed by a mono source?
__________________
Mac Mini M1 | Mac OS 12.6.1 Monterey | Avid Carbon + 2x Carbon Pre | Pro Tools Studio 2024.3
Reply With Quote