Who wants a RTAS version of nebula?

[noiZefloor]

I've tried tried nebula several times and I've really got to say it sounds fantastic. I guess most of you guy know that already. The only problem is, that there is still no RTAS Version of nebula and I really hate to use the fxpansion wrapper. I just realized it when UAD showed up with real rtas plugins, cause now it's really fun to use them with PT.

It seems to be the case that Acustica already requested a rtas development kit several times, but Avid never replied to them. Hey Avid, I know it's up to you to decide who is going to develop rtas plugins. I really appreciate that, as that keeps my system stable, but maybe nebula really worth it.

And maybe (just maybe...) if we I can get enough replies to that thread, you might understand, that you should not ignore Acustica or at least post a reason.

[YashNur]

I certainly would like an RTAS version. And I don't agree with the 'maybe': Nebula totally is worth it: innovative technology, very cool developers and community, and the sweetest-sounding plugins ever.

[Dusty Angel]

+1 Nebula RTAS

[DigitalMetal]

Yes Yes Yes Please !!!!

[enriquesilveti]

We fill the registration today AGAIN.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...assdk1209.jpg/

Enrique Silveti
www.acustica-audio.com

[TempleStudios]

Support! I own nebula and several libraries that I used to use when I was on logic, but since I've moved to PT it's just not good enough with the wrapper. I'd love to use nebula again!

[mlemos]

+1 for rtas

i master in reaper because protools can't handle the stress...wish i didn't have to...but nothing comes close to nebula ITB.

please bring on rtas!

marco

[Emcha_audio]

Why not just wrap it with the fxpansion? If it's like most others vst/au plugins I've tried, it works perfectly in rtas that way.

[mlemos]

i do use nebula in PT via the wrapper but it doesn't work very well and the really CPU intensive neb programs bring protools to it's knees in no time.

[noiZefloor]

Originally Posted by Emcha_audio

Why not just wrap it with the fxpansion? If it's like most others vst/au plugins I've tried, it works perfectly in rtas that way.

the fxpansion wrapper is maybe the most useless piece of software I've ever bought. When I went for PT I tought I could just buy the wrapper and use all my vst plugins as usual. The UAD plugs have been the last wrapped plugins until v6 came out. I'm now running 100% rtas (or tdm) and everything is stable. No CPU spikes anymore. I'm not in will to change this anymore.