Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-18-2006, 06:45 AM
jlcnyc jlcnyc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hell's kitchen
Posts: 687
Default De-Essing......where in the chain?

In the past, I've added the De-Esser after compression and eq.
But now I'm wondering -
Is there a technical reason that dictates where to place the De-Esser? (in the chain of plugs)
Should I De-Ess first? Does it matter?
Is there a concensus on this issue?


thanks in advance
__________________
www.jeffreyleecampbell.com
Mac Pro 2.8 GHz Quad
16GB RAM
Apogee Rosetta 200/ UA LA-610
Genelec 8030A/7050b
McDSP, Waves, Sony, URS, Spectrasonics, BFD, Altiverb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-18-2006, 06:56 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,904
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

If you de-ess first, then the excess "ess" will not affect compression. If you compress first, then the excess "ess" will dominate compression and make the situation worse for de-essing.

Also,

If you eq first, then the eq-ing will affect compression, but if you compress first, then the you can eq the compressed signal.

Think!
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2006, 08:05 AM
jlcnyc jlcnyc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hell's kitchen
Posts: 687
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

Quote:
Think!
I resent your implication that i am not thinking........I am thinking (and trying to learn).
My original logic was that compression (and eq) naturally accentuates the "essing"...therefore I would de-ess after compression (and eq). But then I continued "thinking" that maybe this logic was incorrect.... so I thought I would ask the "friendly" people at the duc. thanks for the answer
__________________
www.jeffreyleecampbell.com
Mac Pro 2.8 GHz Quad
16GB RAM
Apogee Rosetta 200/ UA LA-610
Genelec 8030A/7050b
McDSP, Waves, Sony, URS, Spectrasonics, BFD, Altiverb
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-18-2006, 08:15 AM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

De-ess ---> EQ ---> Compression. My 2 cents.
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-18-2006, 08:34 AM
flommer flommer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 4,118
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

I would say try it both ways and choose what works best for you, because your original "thinking" may have some merit. Your self-critical "thinking" is the most important aspect of the music you are making..

And if you try to imagine that "think!" thing as coming from your inspiring, friendly high-school physics teacher instead of from the grouchy assistant principle who caught you smoking behind the gym then maybe it doesn't come off as so condescending...
__________________
MacPro3ghz, 6GB, 10.7.5, PT10.3.2, Digi002 factory/toolkit2/PTIEP, 11R
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-18-2006, 09:01 AM
hki hki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: La/Helsinki
Posts: 327
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

Quote:
Think!
But then I continued "thinking" that maybe this logic was incorrect.... so I thought I would ask the "friendly" people at the duc. thanks for the answer

[/QUOTE] Some people here do tend to "preach" before actually helping... Look at it as though they are your studio manager or your post production sup. BUT I have to admit, the education you get in here is a lot better than many courses out there.
__________________
"It is better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt".
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2006, 10:09 AM
mnoxious mnoxious is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 160
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

If you are comfortable enough with your monitors and know how well the mix will translate on consumer speakers, headphones, car stereos, etc then just trust your ears. Let your ears be the judege as to what is best for your mix, perhaps that ess sound is desired to add some unconventional flavor to lead vocals. But if you are recording for a book on tape you probably don't want it there at all. And if you're not 100% comfortable with your studio monitors and how they translate to different speakers then take your mix on the road, testing it in every cd player you find.

For me I usually De-ess, Eq, Compression. However lately I've put it second in the chain, Eq, De-ess, Compression and sometimes don't use it at all.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2006, 11:33 AM
bigbadhenchman bigbadhenchman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 836
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

EQ->De-Ess->Compress.

here's my logic.

fisrt, you want to eq the vocals, get them all nice and bright and breathy, right?
problem now, is the esses are killing you.
If you compress first, then the dynamic of the esses is smoothed out, making it harder for the de-esser to grab the offending frequency.
So, you de-ess first. then compess to smooth the vocal out.
__________________
M-Powered Forum

www.markhensley.tv
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2006, 11:53 AM
EGS's Avatar
EGS EGS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,701
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

Quote:
EQ->De-Ess->Compress.

here's my logic.

fisrt, you want to eq the vocals, get them all nice and bright and breathy, right?
problem now, is the esses are killing you.
If you compress first, then the dynamic of the esses is smoothed out, making it harder for the de-esser to grab the offending frequency.
So, you de-ess first. then compess to smooth the vocal out.
I try to eliminate esses at the source with careful mic choice and placement. If I still get some nasty esses then I'll put the de-esser first, so that it has a clear shot at removing the offending ess frequency from the original signal. Then, I EQ (to compensate for the now funky sounding de-essed vocal), and finally compression. De-ess ---> EQ ---> Compression.
__________________
Desktop build: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i9-11900K @ 5.1GHz / 64GB / 4TB NVMe PCIe 4 / Gigabyte Z590 Vision D / PreSonus 2626
Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 11 / i5-12500H / 16GB / 1TB NVMe / Lenovo IdeaPad 5i Pro / U-PHORIA UMC1820
Ancient/Legacy (still works!): PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI 001
Click for audio/video demo
Click for resume
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-18-2006, 12:08 PM
bigbadhenchman bigbadhenchman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 836
Default Re: De-Essing......where in the chain?

Quote:
Quote:
EQ->De-Ess->Compress.

here's my logic.

fisrt, you want to eq the vocals, get them all nice and bright and breathy, right?
problem now, is the esses are killing you.
If you compress first, then the dynamic of the esses is smoothed out, making it harder for the de-esser to grab the offending frequency.
So, you de-ess first. then compess to smooth the vocal out.
I try to eliminate esses at the source with careful mic choice and placement. If I still get some nasty esses then I'll put the de-esser first, so that it has a clear shot at removing the offending ess frequency from the original signal. Then, I EQ (to compensate for the now funky sounding de-essed vocal), and finally compression. De-ess ---> EQ ---> Compression.
I tend to not use any processign when recording.
The goal for me is to record as flat as possible, then mess with it later.
__________________
M-Powered Forum

www.markhensley.tv
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
De-essing Notefarm 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 08-21-2004 09:34 AM
De-essing Vocals skylab001 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 03-15-2004 01:11 PM
Hand de-essing tips please! Jules Tips & Tricks 21 04-02-2003 01:52 AM
De-essing With Digi???? sugarfuzz 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 06-25-2002 11:17 AM
Peculiar De-essing technique... DigiDawg Tips & Tricks 16 06-25-2000 09:14 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com