Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Mixing > Avid S6

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2020, 08:58 AM
leopod leopod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 21
Default S6 performance - Mac Pro 5,1 vs Mac Pro 7,1

Quick question here : could I expect a major boost in S6 overall performance with a Mac Pro 7,1 (let's say 16 core/96GB RAM MacOS 10.15.7 PT 2020.11 HDX3 for the example), against a Mac Pro 5,1 (2010 12-core 32GB RAM Mac OS 10.12.6 PT 2019.6 HDX3)? I noticed Eucon (WSControl) seems to eat up a lot of memory, so I figure the 32GB to 96GB would make a difference, but can host CPU also influence responsiveness and layout build speeds on the S6, or even just the version update on the MTM (19.6 to 20.11)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2020, 09:54 AM
creativecontrol's Avatar
creativecontrol creativecontrol is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,195
Default Re: S6 performance - Mac Pro 5,1 vs Mac Pro 7,1

I'l defer to Eddie on some of this -> but in general, Avid has improved EUCON performance in WSControl through optimizations over the last several versions released. S6 19.12 did have some very significant optimizations for the Master Module when Attentioning for example. So although I would still personally recommend purchasing as much RAM as you can afford for your audio workstation, most of the improvements with drawing data, caching and banking performance are due to optimizations that were worked on by the EUCON team. Hope this helps.


Jeff
__________________
Jeff Komar
Solutions Specialist, Pro Audio
Avid
S6 FAQ
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2020, 10:16 AM
leopod leopod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 21
Default Re: S6 performance - Mac Pro 5,1 vs Mac Pro 7,1

Thanks Jeff, this helps. Regarding RAM, WSControlapp would bring memory usage from ~50% to ~85-90% in our heavy sessions, with our actual 32GB RAM, so I guess 96GB could buy us enough headroom for the time being. We might follow your recommendation and aim a little higher RAM though (128GB or 192GB), but definitely updating to latest supported macOS and PT/Eucon version seems like our path to overall performance improvement, even if this means sacrificing 32 bits apps/plugins and previous video engine. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance? reichman Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 11 02-09-2008 11:39 AM
PT 7.3 vs 7.4 PPC performance? reichman Post - Surround - Video 0 01-31-2008 02:02 PM
performance LadyElectrikStudios 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 12-13-2003 02:30 PM
has anyone a/b'd performance of a g3 vs. a g4 mullet rocker 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 25 06-22-2001 09:04 PM
what can i add to my g4. for better performance? search-one 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 11-17-2000 05:57 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com