Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support
Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 9
Reload this Page PT 10 needs a much better browser
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2011, 12:44 PM
JonLance JonLance is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 36
Default PT 10 needs a much better browser
Can the developers please look into the browser work from Studio One,see how a real browser should work,the workspace thing is terrible imo..

and please get rid of whatever limitations you guys have with the error codes because PT is so picky about hd's..

No other daw has that problem,, I mean I can't even drag a wav sample from the workspace,PT throws up some error code, what's all that all about?? Bad coding thats what!

Oh and I've tested it with an ssd hard drive, as well as raptor hd's so don't give me that crap about the drive is too slow..
__________________
Mac Mac Pro 8 Core|12GB Ram|Snow Leopard OSX 10.6.7
Pc Core i7 950|X58A-UD3R|12gb Corsair Dominator 1600mhz|Win7 64
Hardware: Mbox3|Mytek Stereo192 AD|Mytek Stereo96 DA
Akai MPK 88|Novation 61SL MKII |Grace 101|Focusrite Pre
Monitor Station|HP4|Faderport|DynAudio Bm5a MK2|Event Tr8|22 GIK Traps|2Ears
Software: Pro Tools 9.03|Logic 9|Studio One Pro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2011, 02:24 PM
coolbass coolbass is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 145
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
I see a new Mister Know-it-all has joined the DUC.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:01 PM
JonLance JonLance is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 36
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
I know a better browser when I see one,and to think PT has 9 versions and it's still has issues with modern hard drives, that's a problem.. If you feel the PT browser is fine,then be it,but I don't and commented about it..

And a Mr. Know it all? wow!
__________________
Mac Mac Pro 8 Core|12GB Ram|Snow Leopard OSX 10.6.7
Pc Core i7 950|X58A-UD3R|12gb Corsair Dominator 1600mhz|Win7 64
Hardware: Mbox3|Mytek Stereo192 AD|Mytek Stereo96 DA
Akai MPK 88|Novation 61SL MKII |Grace 101|Focusrite Pre
Monitor Station|HP4|Faderport|DynAudio Bm5a MK2|Event Tr8|22 GIK Traps|2Ears
Software: Pro Tools 9.03|Logic 9|Studio One Pro
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:25 PM
myke2242's Avatar
myke2242 myke2242 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Orange, OC
Posts: 441
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Yes workspace is not the best but there are other options.

I dont think it is normal for you to have a error every single time you use WS to transfer. i use it time to time with no errors. you could use the search feature to see if anyone else is having the same issues as you are.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:40 PM
bobbybland bobbybland is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 107
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Yes I've had similar issues with the workspace,just take a look around, there all over the place. On mac the issues weren't nearly as bad as far as I can remember..

I agree a better working browser would be awesome!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2011, 03:44 PM
bradch00 bradch00 is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lions Bay, Canada - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 1,258
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
http://protools.ideascale.com/
Try posting your product enhancement ideas here and see if they catch on.
__________________
Pro Tools, Studio One Pro
2022 Mac Studio M1 Max 64GB-1TB NVME
OWC Thunderbay Mini (4TB SSD)
OWC Express 4M2 (4 X 2TB)
Interface: Presonus Quantum
Presonus Faderport & Faderport 8
Black Lion Sparrow Mk2 A/D, FMR-RNP-RNC, MIDI Xpress 128
BM5A, KRK VXT4, Equator D5
2020 Macbook Pro 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD Audio(mobile rig)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2011, 06:04 PM
zedhed's Avatar
zedhed zedhed is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,935
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradch00 View Post
http://protools.ideascale.com/
Try posting your product enhancement ideas here and see if they catch on.
I agree! The only way things are going to get changed is by posting your comments in the right forum..which btw is not here.
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D
CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz)
Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples)
1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro)
GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4
PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim
CASE: Fractal Define XL R2
PT 11HD (v11.3.2) Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII
HD 96I/O
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2011, 06:25 PM
bobbybland bobbybland is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 107
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Apparently other users agree, check it out here

http://protools.ideascale.com/a/dtd/...dow/28366-3779
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2011, 06:37 PM
zedhed's Avatar
zedhed zedhed is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,935
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbybland View Post
Apparently other users agree, check it out here

http://protools.ideascale.com/a/dtd/...dow/28366-3779
Thanks, I've voted for it.
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D
CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz)
Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples)
1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro)
GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4
PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim
CASE: Fractal Define XL R2
PT 11HD (v11.3.2) Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII
HD 96I/O
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2011, 07:09 PM
bobbybland bobbybland is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 107
Default Re: PT 10 needs a much better browser
Nice! This will be sweet if they offer it,I can see a better workflow indeed for this,nice call to the OP..
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Project browser jamesimm 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 02-06-2012 11:29 AM
Cataloguing in Browser Mac88s 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 04-16-2011 02:00 AM
Best Browser to run on Mac for the DUC? jpf99 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-11-2008 06:28 PM
6.7 cs8 browser bug Dan Pinder Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 03-02-2005 10:38 PM
how to log in without browser judgedave General Discussion 2 11-17-1998 12:33 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 AM.

Contact Us - Home Pond - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com