Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
06-29-2010, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
44.1 kHz vs. 48 kHz - why not use the higher?
Hey all,
I've been noticing on here that there are a bunch of people that say that their "standard" sessions are 24 bit 44.1 kHz. I've always used 24 bit 48 kHz sessions, then truncated down to 16 bit 44.1 kHz for mastering. Anyone have reasons, other than file sizes, to NOT use a 48 kHz sample rate? Does the truncation yield a point of diminishing return, i.e., not produce enough of an improvement to offset the detriments of the truncation? What session rates do you use? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| going higher than 10.6.3 | viaspiaggia | Post - Surround - Video | 2 | 06-23-2011 04:41 AM |
| Can I get mp3.dll from 6.7 or higher? | jonah day | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 03-13-2006 01:54 PM |
| Anyone running higher than OS 10.3.4 with 001? | duderonomi | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 04-15-2005 07:59 PM |
| Anyone use JAM v.2.6 with OS 9.1 or higher?? | peter parker | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 11-21-2002 09:38 AM |
| Higher Gain | Tommyboy | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 03-22-2000 06:48 AM |
Threaded Mode