|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
Personally, I like to split my stereo tracks into two mono tracks. The only reason is that I am more comfortable working that way.
Just my 2 cents. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
I had to get onto this one - boy would I love to be smarter that Someone! [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Actually I like to keep stereo recordings on stereo tracks to keep idiots - inclucing myself - from moving one or the other independently by accident - and believe me there are ways to do it - unless you are LOCKED into a stereo track. Groups can be UN grouped - stereo tracks can only be seperated by an act of the FILE menu - and even then the original STEREO track is maintained. BMann |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
I think you guys are missing the point.
He's asking whether or not to record in stereo or mono. Not 2 mono tracks vs 1 stereo track. My opinion would be to try more mono tracks. Here's why. If you're using lots of pads and stuff, it will start to wash together. Alot of synth manufacturers use mono samples with stereo ambience. That's fine for one sound but not with many similar sounds. It's too mono. Try finding the widest sound and keep it stereo. Then find a few not so wide ones and keep them mono but pan them at 11oclock and 2 oclock. Also try takeing one or two of the mono synths and have them pan back and forth in time with the song. (Pen tool) try them at different rates (1/4 note 1/8 note) Really listen to the sounds you choose so as to decide to go mono or stereo. For example: Strings. I tend to use 1 quartet preset thats really wide. I then add a mono Cello (Middle) then a mono Viola and a mono Violin panned almost hard left and right. Just my opinion.
__________________
Pro Tools Tutorials: Mixing Heavy Rock & Metal • Pro Tools 11 - Tips and Tricks • Delay Explained • Tracking Rock - Drums • Mixing Rock • Music Production with Pro Tools • Pro Tools Tips and Tricks Vol. 2 • Pro Tools Tips and Tricks Vol. 3 • Elastic Audio in Action |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
Thanks. That was my question, and that makes sense. I will try some of those techniques.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
Yeah, what Produceher said...
After years of doing the same thing (recording everything in stereo), i realized that have some strong mono signals, panned nicely to various spots in the aural field is way better for getting mixes to sit well. Having everything spread to the far reaches leaves a mix washy and non-descript, not to mention the overlap of frequencies, eating up precious room for other instruments to sound full. Give a try to what Produceher said - get one, or a couple of well defined stereo sounds, and start to pepper the rest as mono - you will find panning them appropriately will allow less drastic EQ'ing to have a mix that sits, as well give a sense of defined placement within the stereo field... YMMV,
__________________
Jay PlugHead Productions |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A question for people smarter than me....
This question is about recording with stereo tracks. When I am building a track, I usually ind that I end up recording on many stereo tracks and just a few mono tracks. The mono I will reserve for bass, vocals, some drum hits--monophonic stuff like that. BUT, I also do a lot of layering with samples, keyboard sounds, pads, etc. and they quite often have a less ambient sound when recorded as mono as opposed to stereo--so I just record all that stuff in stereo. I'm usually happy with the way my mixes sound, so maybe there is not a problem. But my question is (because I have heard this before) would I be better by recording more stuff to mono tracks because everything somehow washes when there are many tracks of stereo(that's what I've heard)I tend to do a lot of panning within each stereo pair. Is this redundant?
I've never done a side-by-side, scientific comparison between these two so I'm not sure. Educate me please. Thanks in advance. Scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
What you can also do is build yourself an "effect console" (once done you can import it from session to session) that effectively reproduces what is happening inside your synth. Usually that means having one aux track with some kind of stereo chorus or harmonizer, one with a reverb that works well with pads, and eventually one with a "magical" stereo delay (in tempo) combination. Each one with a bus as input.
That way you can strip a synth sound naked of any effect, record it in mono, pan it as you like and find the right combination of bus sends to recreate the ambience. In the case of analog pads you may even record two slightly modified patches each on its own mono track, and pan them left-right for maximum effect (always check in mono however for any excessive phasing) However some synth have beautiful stereo so its up to you to find which ones can be recorded mono or stereo |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
I agree with Produceher. If you record everything in stereo (just because they sound "better" when soloing them ) you'll end up with a BIG MONO SOUND_!
__________________
Camilo Orozco Like us on www.facebook.com/artedigitalestudio www.estudiodegrabacion.com.mx |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
I'm getting smarter by the minute!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question for people smarter than me....
From reading all of your posts I'm getting smarter tooooo. Mono vs. stereo hmm [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
Don't confuse kindness for weakness |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
output assign request...make it smarter... | clarpark | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 11-19-2004 12:29 PM |
Mac users are smarter | WorldOfWiz | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 07-15-2002 12:03 AM |
A Question for People With 933's | decibel | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 04-17-2002 12:31 AM |
Mac Question for any of you PT People | Jordan V | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 18 | 03-26-2002 07:54 AM |
question for post people | anders | Tips & Tricks | 1 | 04-22-2000 03:52 PM |