Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-08-2023, 09:17 AM
XJENSEN XJENSEN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gent, Belgium, Europe
Posts: 511
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

One tip I can give, though, is to always keep a close eye on the dly indicator in the edit window transport section.
When it turns red, you have a problem with delay compensation that needs fixing.
Hovering over the dly indicator with your pointer will reveal the nature of the problem (e.g. unresolvable ADC loop in bussing).
This helped me solve some errors in my routing.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2023, 05:47 AM
Zep Dude Zep Dude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: NH, USA
Posts: 546
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

Good tip!


I just switched from HD Native to HDX (former TDM user) and am just getting up to speed on the hybrid engine etc. I have a question...

One thing I used to do with TDM for tracking was keep the plugin load light and only use low latency stuff like Sonnox EQ's (4 samples) etc, then disable delay comp to be sure the musician wasn't hearing any delay. Reverb plugins might be delayed by their longer latencies but that's called pre-delay so no problem there for basic tracking. The only issue would be if I started mixing and then we had to do an overdub. Then, I would disable as many plugs as possible looking at the delay comp for each track until latency was down below 15 samples or so and do the overdub, then re-enable the plugs and keep mixing.


It would seem that this same methodology would make sense for HDX,


HOWEVER

With HDX there is also now a HW Buffer (64, 128 smpls etc) even without the hybrid engine engaged.


So my question is, if for tracking I stay with only low latency HDX plugins, does the HW buffer impose any additional delay for the musician? Or is that only applied if using native plugins?
__________________
Angelo
Majestic Music
www.majesticmusic.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2023, 07:39 AM
BScout BScout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,196
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zep Dude View Post
Good tip!


I just switched from HD Native to HDX (former TDM user) and am just getting up to speed on the hybrid engine etc. I have a question...

One thing I used to do with TDM for tracking was keep the plugin load light and only use low latency stuff like Sonnox EQ's (4 samples) etc, then disable delay comp to be sure the musician wasn't hearing any delay. Reverb plugins might be delayed by their longer latencies but that's called pre-delay so no problem there for basic tracking. The only issue would be if I started mixing and then we had to do an overdub. Then, I would disable as many plugs as possible looking at the delay comp for each track until latency was down below 15 samples or so and do the overdub, then re-enable the plugs and keep mixing.


It would seem that this same methodology would make sense for HDX,


HOWEVER

With HDX there is also now a HW Buffer (64, 128 smpls etc) even without the hybrid engine engaged.


So my question is, if for tracking I stay with only low latency HDX plugins, does the HW buffer impose any additional delay for the musician? Or is that only applied if using native plugins?
If you are in hybrid mode it is NOT the same thing as your TDM system. You have to put the track in DSP mode (lightning bolt on the channel.) If you do not, you have all the normal latencies of a CoreAudio system and yes, that buffer settings is part of the total latency in that case (doubled if the musician is monitoring the Pro Tools output.)

If you want the same functions as TDM, you need to have your playback engine in "classic" HDX mode (not hybrid.)

Also, FYI, on audio tracks, delay comp is disabled automatically when in record or input enabled by default. You don't need to do anything (only aux tracks will also have delay comp on since they don't have input enable or record)
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface ProS1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 coreQNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-07-2023, 04:31 AM
LDS LDS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,502
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zep Dude View Post

HOWEVER

With HDX there is also now a HW Buffer (64, 128 smpls etc) even without the hybrid engine engaged.

So my question is, if for tracking I stay with only low latency HDX plugins, does the HW buffer impose any additional delay for the musician? Or is that only applied if using native plugins?

TDM has always had the same HW buffer settings as HDX. It refers to the native sample buffer, and only gets invoked when you use native processing in a session - RTAS plugins in a session instead of TDM plugins, or in the case of HDX, AAX-Native plugins instead of AAX-DSP.

If you are in classic mode and only use AAX-DSP plugins, the HW buffer setting is bypassed in HDX in exactly the same way as it is in TDM.

Here is the same settings in HD TDM:
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-17-2023, 06:22 PM
Guy McDude Guy McDude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: US
Posts: 372
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

Quote:
Originally Posted by BScout View Post
If you are in hybrid mode it is NOT the same thing as your TDM system. You have to put the track in DSP mode (lightning bolt on the channel.) If you do not, you have all the normal latencies of a CoreAudio system and yes, that buffer settings is part of the total latency in that case (doubled if the musician is monitoring the Pro Tools output.)

If you want the same functions as TDM, you need to have your playback engine in "classic" HDX mode (not hybrid.)

Also, FYI, on audio tracks, delay comp is disabled automatically when in record or input enabled by default. You don't need to do anything (only aux tracks will also have delay comp on since they don't have input enable or record)
Hi,
are you a regular user of Hybrid Mode while recording?

If so, id love to hear about your experiences, as mine have not been positive at all.

thanks in advance
__________________
Best,
Sean

Sean McDonald
Red Medicine Recording LLC
Sofa King Music Services
http://www.seanmcdonald.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-17-2023, 07:59 PM
BScout BScout is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,196
Default Re: HDX Monitoring Latency vs TDM Accel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy McDude View Post
Hi,
are you a regular user of Hybrid Mode while recording?

If so, id love to hear about your experiences, as mine have not been positive at all.

thanks in advance
Yes. I've used it for smaller recordings (VO, etc.) Lots of stuff where sync is very important. (Large recordings -- orchestra -- I use Classic HDX mode.)
Zero problems.
All those systems I used hybrid/recording are Mac Pro 7,1 (intel) and I haven't used them after 2023.6 for recording. But sync was perfect each time.

Generally hybrid systems for me are only for mixing because it's just more steps when using it for recording. When recording is done in hybrid, it's because I just need a quick add to a mix. Haven't been recording with the Apple M processors (only mixing.) Not because of any choice -- just how the systems are set up in the different locations.
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface ProS1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 coreQNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Monitoring through headphones with Apollo 8 - when selecting Low Latency Monitoring Mick335 Pro Tools 12 2 04-10-2018 08:34 AM
Low Latency monitoring is Gone!! johnjoedaly Pro Tools 12 10 12-14-2016 11:59 AM
HDX latency vs. HD Accel blairl Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 6 10-25-2011 03:21 AM
lowest latency without "low latency monitoring" ? music project 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 6 05-11-2010 08:40 AM
Latency problem with my HD3 Accel Drive d Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 1 06-19-2005 04:55 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com