|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Which, if any, of these services affect Pro Tools performance?
I have the latest Mac Mini with the latest MacOS (X) and want to configure it to be absolutely as Pro Tools friendly as possible and I have all of the above running all the time (not that they're *active* all the time, but they're on).
__________________
Pearlman Church Microphone > Great River MP-2NV > Warm Audio WA-76 > Apogee Symphony MK II 8x8+8MP > PT2018 on 2018 Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM running Mojave. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
If they are being used while Pro Tools is running they can all impact Pro Tools.
You should not be recording to any of of these cloud drives, but sounds like you are not. If you want to copy/archive content to them that can work great, but you don't want any of them running/syncing while Pro Tools is running.. so disable or log out from the service while using Pro Tools... and maybe you don't want WiFi or maybe not any Internet connection while using Pro Tools. Do you really need three cloud storage services? Time Machine can be OK for backup/archive of user documents and Pro Tools sessions but there are better ways of doing system backups, like cloning boot drives using Carbon Copy Cloner. I would not rely on TimeMachine for that. If you are I'd reconsider that. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Quote:
I ask because I used to have a 2008 Mac Pro which had fewer performance issues than my current, faster-on-paper Mac Mini, and I never had to turn off TimeMachine or Dropbox, though I didn't have Backblaze back then (that's a new thing). I'm just at the point where I want to eliminate all the unnecessary background services to see if that helps.
__________________
Pearlman Church Microphone > Great River MP-2NV > Warm Audio WA-76 > Apogee Symphony MK II 8x8+8MP > PT2018 on 2018 Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM running Mojave. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
What actual issues are you getting?
There is a lot of other stuff to look at. Do all the optimizations, *every* last one to start with. WiFi off, BT off, all plugins up to date, power management settings, make sure disk cache is set to a size to cache your sessions (not set to "normal"), sessions and samples are hopefully running off your internal PCIe SSD, plugins are all up to date, etc. etc. Are you getting CPU errors? Pro Tools 2019.5 and later improved plugin processing significantly for many workloads. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
FWIW - I’m a solo/hobbyist and use TimeMachine via external SSD for OS-level file versioning, Backblaze for cloud backup *AND* OneDrive for crosss-device synchronization. Yes, all at the same time - while running ProTools.
No issues. Granted - I’m a lone-ranger with modest-sized sessions on a fast computer and a fat internet pipe. It can be done in certain setups. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Hello,
It's possible to use these four services without appearing to affect ProTools performance, but they all use resources. From your note you said you were trying to make it as PT friendly as possible, here are a few thoughts - - iCloud - if you are logged in to iCloud it occasionally checks online to update stuff - browser history, Calendar, Messages, etc. In theory it occurs when not too much is going on but you can't guarantee that. Your personal machine is one thing but our production machines are not logged into iCloud at all. You'll still get Console entries as it tries to connect but nothing happens. Up to you. However - if you have enabled iCloud Drive then it's doing the same for online storage which is even more resource consuming. I turn that off completely even on my personal machine. - Time Machine - TM occasionally checks the backup drive which can interfere with performance. In theory it occurs when not too much is going on but you can't guarantee that and drive access is time consuming. I always disconnect TM volumes when working. - Dropbox and Backblaze - I don't use Backblaze but am familiar with it and Dropbox is similar. They're checking online periodically to see what needs to be backed up, this can consume resources. I've seen several clients with severe UI and performance issues running Office 360 online, Dropbox, iCloud Drive, disabling all of them solved their issues. I never have online things running during production to avoid performance issues. The above is based on you wanting to "configure it to be absolutely as Pro Tools friendly as possible". I would disable them all when doing production but that's up to you. Hugh |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Quote:
__________________
Pearlman Church Microphone > Great River MP-2NV > Warm Audio WA-76 > Apogee Symphony MK II 8x8+8MP > PT2018 on 2018 Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM running Mojave. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Lots of standard troubleshooting to dive into then. Maybe these issues are related, maybe not. But as always suspect plugins, start by trashing prefs and double checking you have every optimization done.
Hopefully this happens frequently enough it is easy to troubleshoot. Uncheck ignore errors to help there.. and within reason set the IO buffer size to the point where errors happen frequently enough to try to more easily find the cause (but esp. when using VIs that just may not be able to track with very small IO buffers... look at freezing tracks if needed). Make troubleshooting progress by trying big bold steps. For example try disabling networking in macOS (would be already if I fully optimized the system) ... still problems, then its likely not your cloud services. Move all .aaxplugin files out of the plugin folder and test with only Pro Tools default ones.... if still a problem then its not a third party plugin, otherwise put them back in batches until the problem comes back, and keep iterating. If a plugin is causing problems may or may not be one you are actually using. Try using built in output etc. to exclude the interface/driver. Get disk cache set large enough to fully cache the session, look at the cache meters, only use after green=fully loaded... that excludes most Pro Tools disk IO issues, but not VI sample issues.. You might want to try a more recent version of PT, 2019.5 or later with AAX processing improvements. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Quote:
__________________
Pearlman Church Microphone > Great River MP-2NV > Warm Audio WA-76 > Apogee Symphony MK II 8x8+8MP > PT2018 on 2018 Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM running Mojave. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Time machine, Backblaze affect Pro Tools performance?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DAW problems? How computer components affect DAW performance | Richard901 | General Discussion | 1 | 12-12-2015 10:37 AM |
Time Machine during Pro tools | cananball | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 12-31-2012 11:22 AM |
Pro Tools-Time Machine screw up | subwoof | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 04-11-2011 05:12 PM |
Allocation Size for HD affect performance for PT? | Matt Whritenour | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 04-11-2005 07:53 PM |
Will AGP 1X affect performance? | JonB | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 9 | 07-03-2002 07:49 AM |