Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 10
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2013, 06:46 PM
Mr. Kelly Mr. Kelly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newton, MA 02458
Posts: 272
Default Routing conundrum

Ok, you PT geniuses!

Here's a conundrum for you...

I just migrated over from PT6... (It's about time!)

I'm trying to get hardware inserts to work, but I'm encountering an unusual difficulty.

All of the I/Os in PT seem to be in order, but the only time I can get a hardware insert to work is if I call up the insert on track "A" and bus it to track "B". Then, I can hear the insert loop. Ironically, even when both tracks are outputted to the same destination, I still can't get sound from the insert unless I bus it to an alternate track. Sends won't work, either. Only bussing.

I can actually see the meter of the original track that the insert is on showing that the signal is passing through, but I just can't hear it unless I bus it to an alternate track. Very strange, eh?

Even if I just pull the insert to the second track, it won't work. Only works if I bus it from one to another.

However... the inserts WILL work if I call them up in a master track. Geeze, Louise!

This may be of relevance… All of my hardware is connected to channels on my Lynx Aurora, and my Aurora is acting as my main monitoring device by means of PT routing its main outputs through channels 1-2 of the Aurora. Does that make sense?

Any thoughts? Am I missing something obvious in PT 10?

Hope you can help!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2013, 07:43 PM
nst7 nst7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 9,864
Default Re: Routing conundrum

Is the hardware coming into the same input as the output? For example, if you go output no. 4, you need to use input 4 as well, for Protools to recognize it as an insert.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-09-2013, 03:39 AM
Bill Denton Bill Denton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,644
Default Re: Routing conundrum

@Mr. Kelly...

Can't get a read on your experience level, but let me put this out there and if it's not applicable you can ignore it...

Beginning with PT 9, significant changes were made to PT's I/O setup.

If you have not read the I/O section of the manual it might be worth your while. Also, there is an "IO Setup Primer.pdf" in the Pro Tools documentation folder that I've found useful...
__________________
X
Note that all opinions, observations, whatever, in this post are mine, unless I'm being mean or am wrong, in which case it's somebody else's fault. I do not work for Avid (their loss)...my only relationship with Avid is that of a customer (when I'm not too poor to buy stuff, like now)...and that hot administrative assistant...that's more of a "thing" than a "relationship" (that should keep them guessing for a while...)

Just rockin'...what more is there?

Bill in Pittsburgh
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2013, 06:13 PM
Mr. Kelly Mr. Kelly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newton, MA 02458
Posts: 272
Default Re: Routing conundrum

Thanks for the thoughts...

Well, I'm pretty intuitive when it comes to routing... Plus, I went through and skimmed/read the entire section regarding i/o for PT10.

Everything seems to be in place. Not sure why it's being finicky.

At the risk of being repetitive:

Let's say I have a hardware reverb... It's plugged into the in/outputs of my Lynx Aurora's channel 3-4. The Lynx is connected by USB to the computer.

- the i/0 settings say that inserts for 3-4 are active and in place. Main outs are routed to the channels 1-2 of my lynx aurora, and is validated through the i/o pages for input and output.


- no sound is heard if I activate the i/o insert on any track for channels 3-4, although you can see the meters of the hardware reverb showing activity, so the output seems to be working.

- no sound is also heard if I set the output of a track to channels 3-4, and then set the input of an aux track (or recording track) to channels 3-4. Then I set the output of that second track to main outs. This worked every time on my PT 6.1.

The only way I've gotten a return is by putting the hardware insert on a regular track, bus that track's output to the the same number on a different track, and output that track to regular main outs. THIS works, but I can't then hear the original track, since it's been bussed to the aux track.

Is this making any sense? What doesn't make any sense is why it's responding this way!!

HELP!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-11-2013, 06:01 AM
Mr. Kelly Mr. Kelly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newton, MA 02458
Posts: 272
Default Re: Routing conundrum

Geeze... 200+ readers... an no one has a "Oh... I KNOW WHAT IT MIGHT BE"???

Any brainiacs have the solution???

I'm beginning to think it may have something to do w. the Lynx routing... which is what I've been working on, but it seems that all is ok there, too. Have to try again tonight... wasting tons of time... trying to get the stinking things to work!

I do understand those who hire engineers and producers to take care of all of this. Musicians who want to do this stuff all on their own spend SO much time on maintaining the systems!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2013, 11:15 AM
Craig F Craig F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,606
Default Re: Routing conundrum

I think Bill is on the right track. Maybe Analog/Digital I/O setting?
screen shots of your routing and settings would be useful
__________________
...

"Fly High Freeee click psst tic tic tic click Bird Yeah!" - dave911


Thank you,

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-11-2013, 07:22 PM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,331
Default Re: Routing conundrum

With a reverb, I would not use inserts. I would route AUX sends to outputs, and return the reverb to a new stereo track(either AUX or Audio, depending on a few things). I would likely return to an audio track and print the reverb so it becomes a permanent file in the session. As said, with inserts, you must use matching numbered IO.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Client conundrum jmitchell1532 General Discussion 16 12-04-2012 08:33 AM
Recording conundrum Stig Eliassen Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 4 10-08-2012 12:53 PM
Conundrum....I armytanker 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 09-05-2012 04:40 PM
ReWire Conundrum midi sordino 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-11-2008 11:05 AM
Dat-less Mastering: Or That old I/O conundrum classics Tips & Tricks 3 05-23-2002 06:53 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com