Pro Tools 2019 !

[moshuajusic]

Originally Posted by Eric Lambert

Why does it have to be Q1? What's to stop them from posting in Q2 or Q3?

The whole point of moving to a $$$$ub$$$$cription model was to provide more frequent updates.

[AlexLakis]

Originally Posted by Johnny Hulst

And the avid guy had it running on Mojave. but the beta was buggy as hell it frooze up during his presentation 4 times. Had to shut it down completly to get it running again.

This is what disturbs me. Seems like whenever Avid gives a presentation Pro Tools crashes multiple times...If Avid can't even get it working on their own systems where does that leave us?

I am running 12.6 on the latest version of Mojave with no issues (with Hyperthreading disabled)...Why would I pay money to re-up my subscription to potentially compromise my system's stability just for "official" Mojave support that doesn't even work?

[john1192]

Originally Posted by jscomposer

The whole point of moving to a $$$$ub$$$$cription model was to provide more frequent updates.

the hard working folks over at Avid have 13 days !!! for this release to still be called 2018.3 ...

[xrekcor]

Originally Posted by akhafaji

To me if no folder track and/or ARA then this update is useless, it's been a while and these 2 things will improve my workflow big time.

Perhaps PT isn't for you then....

[xrekcor]

Originally Posted by maltastudio

we spend time making music not waiting for updates.

Peace

too true..... if you cant create with the current ver of PT perhaps PT isn't for you.

[LDS]

Originally Posted by Eric Lambert

Why does it have to be Q1? What's to stop them from posting in Q2 or Q3?

My understanding of the situation is that a publicly listed companies are required to release products in the same quarter that they are announced. Or something along those lines...

[LDS]

Originally Posted by AlexLakis

This is what disturbs me. Seems like whenever Avid gives a presentation Pro Tools crashes multiple times...If Avid can't even get it working on their own systems where does that leave us?

I am running 12.6 on the latest version of Mojave with no issues (with Hyperthreading disabled)...Why would I pay money to re-up my subscription to potentially compromise my system's stability just for "official" Mojave support that doesn't even work?

Why don't we at least wait for Avid to actually release the update before kicking the hysteria into gear?

[xrekcor]

Originally Posted by LDS

My understanding of the situation is that a publicly listed companies are required to release products in the same quarter that they are announced. Or something along those lines...

MS is in a lot of poop then... along with a lot of other software companies

[LDS]

Originally Posted by Jcalla

I'm no software dev, but that would be a cool solution to implement this feature, if we were talking about a very stable software that would be able to do this without adding any glitches during real-time recording. I feel like most DAWs wouldn't be able to handle it properly, especially not Pro Tools.

Software is based on the computer running it. Inserting any plugin while rolling is going to create a CPU spike of some kind, it's just a question of how big it is. The only situation I could ever think of using such a feature, is sitting around during the tracking of a long live gig where it would allow me to partially mix it on the fly... which is probably the one time that you don't want to be messing around with altering CPU loads for the sake of getting a continuous take.

When would you actually need this? It seems like a solution to a problem that doesn't really exist!

[LDS]

Originally Posted by AlexLakis

No hysteria, just the same old song. But yeah, I'm sure they'll fix all the DAE/AAE errors they haven't fixed in the past 15 years in the next 12 days.

But that is just more hysteria. If you haven't been able to run a stable Pro Tools system in the last 15 years, then no software update, regardless of its quality is ever going to help you.