|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Nehalem YES - but which one?
Hi all,
I'm very close to buying one the new Mac Pro "Nehalem" Models only to run ProTools on it. But the question is which on to buy? Now for roughly the same amount of money, I can choose to put 8 GB of RAM in a quad 2.93 OR buy a Octad 2.26 Ghz (also with 8 GB RAM). The later scores better on multithread programs but around the same as a 2008 2.88 Mac Pro on single threaded program (like ProTools). The Quad 2.93 socres better on single threaded of all the mentioned machines. What to do? I usually do not run a lot of RTAS plugs as I think the sound not as good as there TDM counterparts. I tend to max out my HD3 system on the TDM side though. Peter www.clearproduction.dk
__________________
Kind Regards Peter www.peterjuulkristensen.com http://www.facebook.com/mixingmusic |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nehalem YES - but which one?
Hi,
you may wanna take a look at this report. The guy writing them is amazing and you can learn a lot from reading all the reports on this site http://macperformanceguide.com/Revie...roNehalem.html
__________________
2016 MacBook Pro Retina | 16GB RAM | 1TB SSD | OS X Latest - PTHD 12 Latest | 4K LG Thunderbolt Display | Logic Pro 10 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nehalem YES - but which one?
Hi,
I recently had the same choice to make. I went with the Quad 2.93 with 8 GB of RAM; I later upped my RAM to 16 GB. I moved from a dual 2.5 G5 and I couldn't be happier. The machine is lightning fast and I haven't a single crash or issue regarding Pro Tools in the last few weeks; working 6-7 days a week with heavy mix sessions. (the machine was lightning fast with the 8GB of RAM, but even snappier with the 16 GB) I'm running PT 8cs2 with an Accel HD6 using a Magma PE6R4-I. Another note, the updated Magma PE6R4-I is dead quiet. Best, JSR |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Nehalem YES - but which one?
Hi 25ghost and others...
Mr. Lloyd Chambers recommends buying the 8-core system even though he also concludes, that very few programs utilize all 8 cores. Some programs are even slower on octad. So I guess my question (to DIGI?) is: Will ProTools utilize 8 cores within the lifespan of a brand new Mac Pro Octad (say two years?) Mr. Chambers also recommends bump'in the RAM up to at least 16GB. Will this also be the case with ProTools? DIGI?
__________________
Kind Regards Peter www.peterjuulkristensen.com http://www.facebook.com/mixingmusic |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nehalem YES - but which one?
Hey JSR,
Are you saying you did NOT go with the 8-core? I thought with the Quad 2.93 that 8GB RAM was the max. Can you clarify for me? Thanks! Rob Burrell aka mixboy |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Nehalem YES - but which one?
Quote:
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nehalem Processors | JMDNYC | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 13 | 09-15-2009 03:52 PM |
PT HD 7.4.2 on MacPro Nehalem w/ 10.5.8? | technerd | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 1 | 09-10-2009 11:19 PM |
anyone using a nehalem mac pro with 7.4.2 sucessfully? | diamondschwin | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 06-11-2009 05:52 AM |
New Nehalem + TV = FAIL | Sean Russell | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 06-10-2009 08:02 PM |
Nehalem MAc Pro Configs | JSR | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 15 | 04-18-2009 01:10 PM |